The relationship between COVID-19 and stroke and its risk factors, a Mendelian randomization analysis

Chao Tang1, MingHong Xu1, Rongcheng Ruan1

  • 1Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, China.

Insights

COVID-19 hospitalization and severity are linked to cardioembolic stroke (CES). This Mendelian randomization study confirms COVID-19 as a risk factor for CES, offering new insights into stroke causes.

Area of Science:

  • Neurology
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Genetics

Background:

  • The association between Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and stroke remains unclear.
  • Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis is a valuable tool for investigating causal relationships between exposures and outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the causal relationship between COVID-19 and stroke using MR analysis.
  • To determine if COVID-19 susceptibility, hospitalization, or severity are risk factors for stroke and its subtypes.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWASs) for COVID-19 (exposure) and stroke (outcome).
  • Employed MR analysis to assess causal links between COVID-19 indicators and stroke.
  • Integrated experimental and validation groups for meta-analysis.

Main Results:

  • A positive causal relationship was found between COVID-19 hospitalization and severity, and cardioembolic stroke (CES).
  • Hospitalization (ORmeta=1.11, p<0.001) and severity (ORmeta=1.07, p=0.002) of COVID-19 were significant risk factors for CES.
  • Results were supported by validation groups and sensitivity analyses.

Conclusions:

  • COVID-19 hospitalization and severity are identified as risk factors for cardioembolic stroke (CES).
  • This study provides novel evidence for the role of COVID-19 in the development of CES.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
63
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
105
Psychoneuroimmunology: Cardiovascular Disease01:27

Psychoneuroimmunology: Cardiovascular Disease

Psychoneuroimmunology (PNI) is a multidisciplinary field that examines how psychological factors, particularly stress, interact with the immune system and impact physical health. Research in PNI has shown that chronic or traumatic stress can disrupt both the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and the sympathetic nervous system. These disruptions contribute to serious health conditions, including cardiovascular diseases.
A key area of focus in PNI is the relationship between stress and coronary...
14