Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 15, 2025

Genome-wide Surveillance of Transcription Errors in Eukaryotic Organisms
Published on: September 13, 2018
Transcription-Coupled Template Reconfiguration of 8-Oxoguanine for Error-Prone Transcription Revealed by
Juntaek Oh1,2,3, Kirill A Konovalov4, Peini Hou1
1Division of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, United States.
Abstract:
Oxidative DNA damage, particularly 8-oxoguanine (8OG), is a significant contributor to transcriptional errors that can alter the cellular phenotype and cell fate. While previous studies proposed that 8OG can use its anti-conformation or syn-conformation to form distinct base pairs with different substrates, it is not clear what conformation 8OG adopts during the template loading step and how different substrates induce transcription-coupled conformational changes of the 8OG template within the active site. Through a combined approach of time-resolved X-ray crystallography and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, our study provides a comprehensive insight into these important questions. We found that the 8OG template behaves very differently for error-free and error-prone transcription. For error-free CTP incorporation, 8OG remains in anti-conformation during template loading, nucleotide binding, and incorporation steps. As for error-prone ATP incorporation, using time-resolved crystallography, we observed that the 8OG template initially adopts anti-conformation during template loading and the initial nucleotide binding step. However, it transitions to the syn-conformation to form a base pair with incoming ATP over the course of the reaction. Eventually, we observed a post-chemistry state where 8OG adopts the syn-conformation, base-paired with newly incorporated AMP. MD simulations further revealed that the 8OG template switches from an anti- to a syn-conformation by partially backtracking and subsequently reloading into the +1 site. These findings significantly contribute to our understanding of how RNA polymerase II navigates 8OG lesions during transcription, shedding light on transcription fidelity control and the lesion bypass of oxidative DNA damage.
More Related Videos
14:27Steady-state, Pre-steady-state, and Single-turnover Kinetic Measurement for DNA Glycosylase Activity
Published on: August 19, 2013
11:58A Simple, Rapid, and Quantitative Assay to Measure Repair of DNA-protein Crosslinks on Plasmids Transfected into Mammalian Cells
Published on: March 5, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Conservative Site-specific Recombination and Phase Variation
The recognition sites for Cre recombinase called LoxP...
Proofreading
Lagging Strand Synthesis
There are several major differences between synthesis of the leading strand and synthesis of the lagging strand. 1) Leading strand synthesis happens in the direction of replication fork opening, whereas lagging strand synthesis happens in the...
Maxam-Gilbert Sequencing
Challenges of the Maxam-Gilbert Method
The...
DNA as a Genetic Template