Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 9, 2025

Comprehensive & Cost Effective Laboratory Monitoring of HIV/AIDS: an African Role Model
Published on: October 31, 2010
Cost and cost-effectiveness of pediatric home-based versus facility-based TB Preventive Treatment in Ethiopia
Akash Malhotra1,2, Ahmed Bedru3, Fiseha Mulatu3
1Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Insights
Home-based tuberculosis preventive treatment (TPT) for child contacts in Ethiopia is cost-saving compared to facility-based care. This approach improves TPT accessibility, especially for disadvantaged households, and offers comparable initiation rates.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Health Economics
- Infectious Disease Epidemiology
Background:
- Tuberculosis preventive treatment (TPT) is crucial for child contacts under 15 in Ethiopia.
- Current facility-based TPT delivery presents accessibility challenges.
- Home-based TPT delivery by community health workers is being explored as an alternative.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the costs and cost-effectiveness of home-based versus facility-based TPT provision for child contacts in Ethiopia.
- To evaluate TPT initiation rates between the two models.
- To identify the most feasible and accessible approach for TPT delivery.
Main Methods:
- A pragmatic, cluster-randomized trial (CHIP TB trial) involving 18 clinics in Ethiopia.
- Randomization to either home-based (intervention) or facility-based (standard of care) TPT management.
- Cost data collected from health service and household perspectives; cost-effectiveness assessed using incremental cost per child contact starting TPT; probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) conducted.
Main Results:
- Home-based TPT management averaged US$18.92 per household, significantly less than the US$27.24 for facility-based TPT (partial-societal perspective).
- Reductions in household out-of-pocket costs were a key driver of cost savings.
- Home-based TPT was less costly and associated with increased TPT initiation in 61.5% of PSA scenarios.
Conclusions:
- Home-based contact management for TPT is a cost-saving strategy, comparable in initiation rates to facility-based care.
- This model enhances TB preventive treatment accessibility, particularly for socio-economically disadvantaged households.
- A hybrid model incorporating household preferences could further improve access and reduce health inequities.
Abstract:
Tuberculosis preventive treatment (TPT) is an essential intervention recommended for all child contacts in Ethiopia under 15 years who are at risk of tuberculosis (TB) infection. We conducted a cost and cost-effectiveness analysis of home-based versus facility-based TPT provision for child contacts in Ethiopia. As part of the CHIP TB trial, a pragmatic, cluster-randomized trial conducted at eighteen clinics in Ethiopia, clinics were randomized to either a home-based model (intervention arm), administered by community health workers, or a facility-based model (standard of care) for managing child contacts. Cost data were collected from both a health service perspective and a household perspective, capturing all costs relevant to TPT. Costs were evaluated on a per-household basis, with the primary outcome being the difference in median costs per household initiating TPT. A secondary outcome assessed the cost-effectiveness as the incremental cost per additional child contact starting TPT. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were conducted to examine the robustness of findings. At an average cost of US$18.92 per household managed, Home-based contact management, including TPT delivery was cost-saving compared to facility-based TPT delivery (US$27.24 per household managed) assessed based on the partial-societal perspectives, largely due to reductions in household out-of-pocket costs. The home-based strategy was both less costly and had increased TPT initiation in 61.5% of the scenarios assessed in the PSA. Home-based contact management is a cost-saving alternative for households and provides comparable initiation rates to facility-based care, making it a feasible approach to improve TB preventive treatment accessibility. Although it does not entirely replace facility-based care, a hybrid model that respects household preferences and allows flexibility in delivery could enhance TB care access for socio-economically disadvantaged households, potentially reducing health inequities. The trial was registered on clinicaltrials.gov NCT04369326 on April 30, 2020. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04369326.
Related Concept Videos
Pulmonary Tuberculosis V
Latent tuberculosis infection occurs when TB bacteria are present in a person's body, but are not causing illness or symptoms. It is not contagious, and preventive treatment is crucial to avoid the...
Pulmonary Tuberculosis IV
Several diagnostic approaches are used to detect TB. The conventional method is the Tuberculin Skin Test (TST), also known as the Mantoux test. However, this method has...
Pulmonary Tuberculosis I
Causative Organism
The primary infectious agent causing tuberculosis is Mycobacterium tuberculosis, a slow-growing, acid-fast, aerobic rod that exhibits sensitivity to heat and ultraviolet light. Instances of Mycobacterium bovis and Mycobacterium avium contributing to the development of TB infection are rare.
Mode of...
Pulmonary Tuberculosis III
The first classification is based on the development of the disease, and it includes the following categories:
Pulmonary Tuberculosis II
Here is a detailed explanation of its pathophysiology:
Transmission: The process begins when a person inhales droplet nuclei containing M. tuberculosis. These are typically released into the air when an individual with pulmonary or...
Transmission-based Precautions II: Airborne and Protective Environment
Airborne precautions:
Use airborne precautions when treating patients known or suspected to have diseases that spread through the air—for example, tuberculosis or measles. These organisms are present in smaller droplets expelled by an infected person and...

