Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2025

A Modified Trier Social Stress Test for Vulnerable Mexican American Adolescents
Published on: July 10, 2017
Preventing suicide with Safe Alternatives for Teens and Youths (SAFETY): a randomised feasibility trial
Moa Karemyr1, Martin Bellander2, Moa Pontén2
1Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden moa.karemyr@ki.se.
Background:
Suicide attempts are common in youth and have potentially lethal outcomes. Effective treatments targeting suicide attempts are scarce.
Objective:
To assess the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a family-based cognitive behavioural treatment relative to an active control for youth with suicidal behaviour.
Methods:
30 youths (93% female; mean (SD) age=14.6 (1.5) years) residing in Sweden with recent suicidal behaviour (last 3 months) and at least one available parent were randomised to 12 weeks of the family-based cognitive behavioural treatment Safe Alternatives for Teens and Youths (SAFETY) or supportive therapy, an active control treatment. Primary endpoint was 3-month post-treatment. Feasibility outcomes included treatment and assessment compliance, adverse events, treatment credibility and treatment satisfaction. Secondary outcomes included suicide attempt, non-suicidal self-injury, anxiety, depression, quality of life and emotion dysregulation.
Findings:
Both treatments showed high compliance, satisfaction, credibility and session completion, with few adverse events and dropouts as well as low attrition (7% at primary endpoint). At the primary endpoint, two (14%) participants in SAFETY and four (27%) in supportive therapy had attempted suicide. Non-suicidal self-injury was reduced by 95% (incidence rate ratio=0.05 (95% CI 0.01 to 0.20)) in SAFETY and 69% (incidence rate ratio=0.31 (0.11 to 0.83)) in supportive therapy. Participation in SAFETY, but not in supportive therapy, was associated with moderate-to-large within-group improvements in anxiety and depression (Cohen's d=0.85 [0.33 to 1.40]), quality of life (d=1.01 [0.48 to 1.56]) and emotion dysregulation (d=1.22 [0.45 to 2.03]).
Conclusions:
The results suggest that SAFETY is feasible and promising for youth with suicidal behaviour.
Clinical Implications:
A large randomised controlled trial is warranted to further examine the efficacy of SAFETY.
Trial Registration Number:
NCT05537623.
More Related Videos
05:52Handwriting Analysis Indicates Spontaneous Dyskinesias in Neuroleptic Naïve Adolescents at High Risk for Psychosis
Published on: November 21, 2013
08:42Design and Implementation of an fMRI Study Examining Thought Suppression in Young Women with, and At-risk, for Depression
Published on: May 19, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Operant Conditioning Intervention
In operant conditioning, behaviors that are...
Self-Help Support Groups
Accessibility and Cost-Effectiveness
One of the primary strengths of self-help...
Electroconvulsive Therapy