How the presence of others shapes the user experience of service robots
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.Public human-computer interaction (HCI) is influenced by observers. Study shows relatedness drives expressivity with acquaintances, while popularity drives it with strangers, especially if success is anticipated.
Area Of Science
- Human-Computer Interaction (HCI)
- Social Psychology
- Robotics
Background
- Human-computer interaction (HCI) increasingly occurs in public spaces.
- Public interactions can evoke psychological needs like relatedness and popularity.
- Observer presence can influence user preferences for interaction styles.
Purpose Of The Study
- To investigate how different observers (acquaintance vs. stranger) affect psychological needs.
- To examine the impact of these needs on preferences for expressive interactions with service robots.
- To understand the interplay between observer relationship, psychological needs, and interaction expressivity.
Main Methods
- Participants imagined interacting with a service robot in the presence of different observers.
- User preferences for interaction expressivity were assessed.
- Psychological needs (relatedness, popularity) were measured in relation to observer type and expected outcomes.
Main Results
- Need for relatedness was higher with acquaintances, linked to a preference for more expressive interactions.
- Need for popularity was higher with strangers, influencing expressivity preferences only when success was anticipated.
- Observer relationship and expected outcomes significantly modulate user preferences for robot expressivity.
Conclusions
- User-observer relationships critically shape public HCI.
- Designers should consider the social context and user expectations to tailor robot expressivity.
- Understanding psychological drivers is key to designing effective public HCI systems.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Related Concept Videos
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
A good example of social proof is from laugh tracks on television shows. Fullery & Skeffington (1974) found that adding group laughter sounds to material increased how humorous the participants perceived that material, regardless of whether the content itself was funny or not. By adding a laugh...
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
The discussion of bullying highlights the problem of witnesses not intervening to help a victim. This is a common occurrence, as the following well-publicized event demonstrates. In 1964, in Queens, New York, a 19-year-old woman named Kitty Genovese was attacked by a person with a knife near the back entrance to her apartment building and again in the hallway inside her apartment building. When the attack occurred, she screamed for help numerous times and eventually died from her stab wounds.
Conformity is the change in a person’s behavior to go along with the group, even if that person does not agree with the group.
Asch’s Original Study
Solomon Asch conducted several experiments in the 1950s to determine how people are affected by the thoughts and behaviors of other people. In one study, a group of participants was shown a series of printed line segments of different lengths: a, b, and c. Participants were then shown a fourth line segment: x. They...
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...