Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 9, 2025

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
Published on: September 27, 2019
Embrace the heterogeneity in exploratory factor analysis but be transparent about what you do-A commentary on Manapat
David Goretzko1, Melanie Viola Partsch1, Philipp Sterner2
1Department of Methodology and Statistics, Utrecht University.
Abstract:
Manapat et al. (2023) investigated different sources of heterogeneity in exploratory factor analysis in their paper "Evaluating Avoidable Heterogeneity in Exploratory Factor Analysis Results." Their study is an important step toward understanding the volatility of factor analysis results that potentially impair replication attempts in psychology. In this short commentary, we want to address the question which heterogeneity is actually "avoidable" and which heterogeneity can also be desirable in an exploratory analysis. Furthermore, we emphasize the need of greater research transparency when performing and reporting exploratory factor analyses and discuss the potential of preregistrations to avoid unwanted or "avoidable" heterogeneity. When being transparent about methodological decisions and conceptual assumptions that lead to specific configurations, we believe that it is possible to embrace the heterogeneity in exploratory factor analysis and still develop more robust measurement models. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
One-Way ANOVA
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
Test for Homogeneity
Variability: Analysis
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
Factorial Design
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes

