Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 3, 2026

Measuring the Complete-arch Distortion of an Optical Dental Impression
Published on: May 30, 2019
Comparison of Internal Accuracy of Ceramic Veneered Sintered Metal versus Cast Metal Restoration Upon Different
Sanephume Sripairojn1, Niwut Juntavee2, Apa Juntavee3
1Division of Biomaterials and Prosthodontics Research, Faculty of Dentistry, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Abstract:
One critical factor that influences clinical outcomes of fixed dental restorations is the internal gaps between the restoration and the abutment tooth. However, investigating these gaps in the context of fabrication processes with new technologies is few. This study compared internal accuracy of sintered versus cast metal substructures upon different fabrication techniques, veneered with layering and press-on ceramic, during different construction stages, at different sites of restoration.A total of 96 metal substructures were fabricated with a standardized dimension from four techniques: cast metal with traditionally impressed tooth [CmTt], cast metal with digitally milled wax [CmDw], sintered metal with digitally impressed tooth [SmDt], and sintered metal with digitally impressed stone model [SmDm]. They were further subdivided into two subgroups according to the veneering ceramic used [layered (Pl) and press-on (Pp)]. Internal accuracy was evaluated at gingival, gingiva-axial, axial, axio-occlusal, and occlusal locations using silicone replica, after metal coping (As), degassing (De), opaque application (Op), contouring (Co), and glazing (Gl).Analysis of variance and Bonferroni tests were analyzed for significant differences of internal fit upon different factors (α = 0.05).Significantly different internal accuracy was found upon metal substructures fabrication technique, veneering methods, stages, and sites of restoration (p < 0.05). SmDt and SmDm revealed significantly better fit than CmTt and CmDw (p < 0.05). Pp generated significantly better fit than Pl (p < 0.05). Significantly increasing gaps were found upon stages (p < 0.05). Occlusal and axio-occlusal sites exhibited larger gaps than axial, gingivo-axial, and gingival sites (p < 0.05). However, all groups exhibited clinically acceptable internal accuracy.Increasing internal inaccuracies upon stages of fabrication were noticed, with highly observed at the occlusal and axio-occlusal sites. Sintered metal (SmDt, SmDw) provided better accuracy than cast metal (CmTt, CmDw) while press-on veneering generated better accuracy than the layering method. Ceramic press-on sintered metal was suggested for fabrication restoration.
More Related Videos
07:42Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
Published on: December 20, 2024
03:37Impact of Fabrication Techniques and Polishing Procedures on Surface Roughness of Denture Base Resins
Published on: January 17, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Veneer
Other veneering techniques include plain-slicing, quarter-slicing, and rift-slicing. These...
Mechanical Characteristics of Steel
The tension test is fundamental for determining tensile strength. In this test, a steel specimen is stretched using a gripping device until it breaks. The data collected during this test are used...