Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 23, 2025

Author Spotlight: Segmentation and VR for Advanced Neurovascular Interventions
Published on: April 5, 2024
Comparison of In-Person and Virtual Integrated Vascular Surgery Residency Interviews from the Applicant's
Arash Fereydooni1, Andrea T Fisher1, Lucy Yang1
1Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Integrated vascular surgery applicants prefer virtual interviews for planning and well-being, despite finding in-person interviews more comprehensive. Second-look visits after virtual interviews can improve program ranking.
Area of Science:
- Medical Education
- Surgical Training
- Residency Admissions
Background:
- The COVID-19 pandemic shifted integrated vascular surgery residency interviews to virtual formats.
- Some programs resumed in-person interviews in 2023-2024, necessitating an evaluation of applicant preferences.
- This study assesses applicant perspectives on virtual versus in-person interview formats.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate integrated vascular surgery applicants' perspectives on virtual and in-person interview formats.
- To understand applicant preferences regarding interview modalities and their impact on program ranking.
- To identify factors influencing applicant satisfaction and decision-making in residency selection.
Main Methods:
- A voluntary, anonymous survey was administered to students who matched to integrated vascular surgery residency programs in 2024.
- Survey data analyzed applicant experiences with virtual and in-person interviews, including preferences and perceived benefits.
- Quantitative analysis of responses regarding interview format effectiveness and impact on rank list decisions.
Main Results:
- The majority of matched applicants (57.1%) preferred virtual interviews due to ease of planning and improved personal well-being.
- In-person interviews were rated higher for assessing program culture, facilities, and quality of life.
- Virtual interviews were found to be equivalent to in-person for assessing clinical volume and applicant strengths.
- Second-look visits after virtual interviews positively influenced applicant rank lists.
Conclusions:
- Integrated vascular surgery applicants favor virtual interviews for logistical and personal reasons, supplemented by optional second-look visits.
- While in-person interviews offer a more comprehensive assessment, virtual formats provide significant advantages in planning and well-being.
- Addressing the financial burden and scheduling complexities of in-person interviews or second-looks may help mitigate overapplication and overscheduling in residency selection.
More Related Videos
09:55Bridging the Technology Divide in the COVID-19 Era: Using Virtual Outreach to Expose Middle and High School Students to Imaging Technology
Published on: September 28, 2022
08:36The Immersive Cleveland Clinic Virtual Reality Shopping Platform for the Assessment of Instrumental Activities of Daily Living
Published on: July 28, 2022