Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 9, 2025

Author Spotlight: Improving Radiation Therapy Access with Radiation Planning Assistant
Published on: October 6, 2023
Assessing ChatGPT for Clinical Decision-Making in Radiation Oncology, With Open-Ended Questions and Images
Wei-Kai Chuang1, Yung-Shuo Kao2, Yen-Ting Liu3
1Department of Radiation Oncology, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan; Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Purpose:
This study assesses the practicality and correctness of Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT)-4 and 4O's answers to clinical inquiries in radiation oncology, and evaluates ChatGPT-4O for staging nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) cases with magnetic resonance (MR) images.
Methods And Materials:
A total of 164 open-ended questions covering representative professional domains (Clinical_G: knowledge on standardized guidelines; Clinical_C: complex clinical scenarios; Nursing: nursing and health education; and Technology: radiation technology and dosimetry) were prospectively formulated by experts and presented to ChatGPT-4 and 4O. Each ChatGPT's answer was graded as 1 (Directly practical for clinical decision-making), 2 (Correct but inadequate), 3 (Mixed with correct and incorrect information), or 4 (Completely incorrect). ChatGPT-4O was presented with the representative diagnostic MR images of 20 patients with NPC across different T stages, and asked to determine the T stage of each case.
Results:
The proportions of ChatGPT's answers that were practical (grade 1) varied across professional domains (P < .01), higher in Nursing (GPT-4: 91.9%; GPT-4O: 94.6%) and Clinical_G (GPT-4: 82.2%; GPT-4O: 88.9%) domains than in Clinical_C (GPT-4: 54.1%; GPT-4O: 62.2%) and Technology (GPT-4: 64.4%; GPT-4O: 77.8%) domains. The proportions of correct (grade 1+2) answers (GPT-4: 89.6%; GPT-4O: 98.8%; P < .01) were universally high across all professional domains. However, ChatGPT-4O failed to stage NPC cases via MR images, indiscriminately assigning T4 to all actually non-T4 cases (κ = 0; 95% CI, -0.253 to 0.253).
Conclusions:
ChatGPT could be a safe clinical decision-support tool in radiation oncology, because it correctly answered the vast majority of clinical inquiries across professional domains. However, its clinical practicality should be cautiously weighted particularly in the Clinical_C and Technology domains. ChatGPT-4O is not yet mature to interpret diagnostic images for cancer staging.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Positron Emission Tomography
One of the main requirements of a PET scan is a positron-emitting radioisotope, which is produced in a cyclotron and then attached to a substance used by the part of the body...
Radiological Investigation III: Pulmonary Angiogram and PET Scan
Pulmonary Angiogram
A Pulmonary Angiogram is an invasive procedure involving injecting a contrast medium through a catheter threaded into the pulmonary artery or the right side of the heart to visualize the pulmonary vasculature. Computed Tomography (CT) scans have mainly replaced this...
Cancer Survival Analysis

