Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 3, 2026

Induction of Graft-versus-host Disease and In Vivo T Cell Monitoring Using an MHC-matched Murine Model
Published on: August 29, 2012
Efficacy and Safety of Induction Therapy in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis in a
Vural Taner Yılmaz1, Erol Demir2, Hüseyin Koçak1
1Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Akdeniz University Faculty of Medicine, Antalya, Türkiye.
Bacground:
This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of induction treatments in kidney transplant recipients.
Methods:
A total of 2564 kidney transplant recipients from 15 transplant centers were included in the study and were categorized into 3 groups for comparison. Group 1: No induction (n = 222, 8.7%), Group 2: Anti-T lymphocyte globulin (ATLG, n = 1794, 70%) and Group 3: Basiliximab (n = 548, 21.4%). The results were compared across 3 post-transplant periods: the first month, the 1st to 6th month, and the 6th to 12th month.
Results:
Prior to propensity score matching (PSM), there were no significant differences in graft/patient survival, BKV (polyomavirus) incidence, or rejection rates during the first month among the groups. However, the Anti-T lymphocyte globulin (ATLG) group exhibited higher rates of developing donor-specific antibodies (DSA), cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, general infections, and delayed graft function (DGF), along with higher rejection rates at 1 month post-transplant. After the PSM analysis, rejection rates (which were higher in the ATLG group compared to the Basiliximab group only in the first month), graft/patient loss, and BKV rates were comparable. Infection, CMV, and DSA rates remained elevated in the ATLG group. Clinical results of groups 1 and 3 were similar.
Conclusions:
This study shown that ATLG provides positive clinical results despite increased infection and DSA formation in patients with high immunological risk, whereas the efficacy and necessity of induction in patients with low-moderate immunological risk is debatable.
Insights
Anti-T lymphocyte globulin (ATLG) induction in kidney transplants shows benefits for high-risk patients but increases infection and antibody risks. For low-moderate risk patients, induction therapy
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Immunology
- Transplantation Medicine
Background:
- Kidney transplantation requires effective immunosuppression to prevent rejection.
- Induction therapy is a common strategy to manage immunosuppression post-transplant.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy and safety of different induction treatments in kidney transplant recipients.
- To evaluate outcomes based on induction therapy type: no induction, Anti-T lymphocyte globulin (ATLG), and Basiliximab.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective study of 2564 kidney transplant recipients across 15 centers.
- Patients were grouped based on induction therapy: None (n=222), ATLG (n=1794), Basiliximab (n=548).
- Outcomes were assessed at 1 month, 1-6 months, and 6-12 months post-transplant, with propensity score matching (PSM) applied.
Main Results:
- Before PSM, ATLG group showed higher rates of donor-specific antibodies (DSA), cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, general infections, and delayed graft function (DGF).
- After PSM, rejection rates (only in the first month), graft/patient loss, and BKV incidence were comparable between ATLG and Basiliximab groups.
- Elevated infection, CMV, and DSA rates persisted in the ATLG group; outcomes for no induction and Basiliximab groups were similar.
Conclusions:
- ATLG demonstrates clinical benefits in high immunological risk patients, despite increased infection and DSA risks.
- The necessity and efficacy of induction therapy in low-to-moderate immunological risk kidney transplant recipients remain debatable.
- Basiliximab appears to be a safer alternative with comparable outcomes to no induction in certain patient populations.
Related Concept Videos
Kidney Transplant I: Introduction
Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure
Kidney Transplant III: Nursing Management
Acute Kidney Injury I: Introduction
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention

