Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 9, 2025

13:44
Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
Published on: August 30, 2013
42.6K
Workload reduction of digital breast tomosynthesis screening using artificial intelligence and synthetic mammography:
Victor Dahlblom1,2, Magnus Dustler1,3, Sophia Zackrisson1,2
1Lund University, Diagnostic Radiology, Department of Translational Medicine, Malmö, Sweden.
Journal of Medical Imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)
|May 2, 2025
Summary
Artificial intelligence (AI) can optimize breast cancer screening by prioritizing digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) for high-risk cases and using faster synthetic mammography (SM) for low-risk cases, increasing cancer detection with manageable workload.
Area of Science:
- Radiology
- Medical Imaging
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Background:
- Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) offers high sensitivity but requires extensive reading time.
- Synthetic mammography (SM) images, derived from DBT, are quicker to interpret and comparable to digital mammography (DM).
- Balancing screening sensitivity with radiologist workload is a critical challenge in breast cancer detection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the use of artificial intelligence (AI) for stratifying breast cancer screening examinations.
- To determine if AI can direct cases to either SM or DBT reading to minimize workload while maximizing accuracy.
- To compare the efficacy of AI-guided reading strategies against standard reading protocols.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of paired DM and one-view DBT from the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial.
- Utilized the ScreenPoint Transpara 1.7 AI system to analyze DBT examinations.
- Simulated SM reading for low-risk cases (equivalent to DM) and used DBT reading for high-risk cases, exploring various single and double reading combinations.
Main Results:
- Double-reading DBT for the highest-risk 30% of cases and single-reading SM for the remainder detected 122 cancers.
- This approach matched the reading workload of standard DM double reading.
- Achieved 28% more cancer detections than DM double reading and captured 96% of cancers found with full DBT double reading.
Conclusions:
- AI can effectively stratify breast cancer screening examinations in a DBT program.
- High-risk cases benefit from DBT reading, while SM is sufficient for low-risk cases.
- This AI-driven strategy significantly increases cancer detection compared to DM alone, with only a minor increase in reading workload, warranting prospective studies.
Keywords:
artificial intelligencebreast cancer screeningdigital breast tomosynthesissynthetic mammography
