An Expert Consensus Delphi Panel in Metabolic Dysfunction- and Alcohol-associated Liver Disease: Opportunities and
Luis Antonio Diaz1, Veeral Ajmera2, Juan Pablo Arab3
1MASLD Research Center, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California; Departamento de Gastroenterología, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Background & Aims:
Metabolic dysfunction- and alcohol-associated liver disease (MetALD) is a recently defined entity for individuals with liver steatosis, metabolic dysfunction, and increased alcohol intake. However, the current definition of MetALD poses multiple challenges in clinical practice and research. In this Delphi consensus, we provide practical recommendations for the clinical assessment and management of MetALD to address current clinical challenges in MetALD.
Methods:
We used a modified Delphi process, including 2 surveys involving a panel of 28 experts from 10 countries spanning 4 continents. We predefined consensus as requiring an ≥80% agreement.
Results:
The panel reached consensus on 28 statements. Recommendations emphasize the importance of a comprehensive assessment of patients with presumed MetALD, including the quantification of alcohol intake using validated questionnaires and the use of objective biomarkers of alcohol use, such as phosphatidylethanol. The need to reassess metabolic risk factors and liver disease after a period of alcohol abstinence was highlighted to distinguish the primary driver of liver injury. Noninvasive tests were recommended to assess liver disease severity, whereas routine liver biopsy was deemed unnecessary unless other diagnoses were suspected. Comprehensive management strategies should involve multidisciplinary care focusing on lifestyle modifications, alcohol reduction or cessation, weight loss, and exercise. Finally, the panel identified significant gaps in knowledge, advocating for standardized research protocols, longitudinal studies, exploration of pathophysiological mechanisms to inform precision medicine approaches, and the validation of quantitative alcohol biomarkers for identifying MetALD.
Conclusions:
This Delphi consensus provides clear recommendations for the clinical assessment and management of MetALD, addressing the unique challenges posed by this condition.
Related Concept Videos
Ethical Dilemmas II
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Obedience
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...


