Mega-analytic support for Early Start Denver Model, age at intervention start, and pre-intervention developmental
Veronica Mandelli1, Elena Maria Busuoli1, Michel Godel2
1Laboratory for Autism and Neurodevelopmental Disorders, Center for Neuroscience and Cognitive Systems @UniTn, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Rovereto, Italy.
Objective:
Autism early intervention meta-analyses have provided initial answers to questions such as 'what types of interventions work' and 'for what outcomes'? However, we also want to know 'for whom' is early intervention most effective for? Mega-analysis can offer up complementary insights to meta-analyses regarding the 'what works' and 'for what', while also offering unique insights into the 'for whom' question.
Methods:
Here we conduct a mega-analysis with linear mixed effect modeling on AEIR consortium early intervention datasets totaling n=645 children spanning several countries (e.g., USA, Switzerland, Italy, Israel, and Australia). Early Start Denver Model (ESDM) and other non-ESDM approaches (e.g., EIBI, NDBI, other community/treatment as usual approaches) was evaluated as contrasting intervention types. Models also evaluated intervention intensity, type, participant sex, age at intervention start, and pre-intervention developmental quotient. Subscales of Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL), Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (VABS), and Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS) were utilized as outcome measures.
Results:
Neither intervention intensity nor participant sex affected outcomes. ESDM showed faster growth in language and non-verbal cognition compared to non-ESDM intervention. Irrespective of intervention type, earlier intervention start was associated with increased MSEL and VABS scores and decreased ADOS severity. Growth trajectories on the MSEL also varied by pre-intervention developmental quotient, with higher quotients predicting faster growth irrespective of intervention type.
Conclusions:
Age at intervention start and pre-intervention developmental quotient are important individualized factors that predict early intervention response. ESDM also impacts language, non-verbal cognition, and core autism features.
More Related Videos
11:14A Novel Experimental and Analytical Approach to the Multimodal Neural Decoding of Intent During Social Interaction in Freely-behaving Human Infants
Published on: October 4, 2015
09:16Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers
Published on: March 14, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Autism Spectrum Disorder
These core symptoms manifest differently among individuals, ranging from mild to severe. The disorder's complexity extends beyond its clinical presentation, encompassing a diverse range of biological, cognitive, and sociocultural influences.
Modeling in Therapy
Participant Modeling
Participant modeling involves therapists demonstrating calm and effective behaviors in...
Environmental Influences on Intelligence
Operant Conditioning Intervention
In operant conditioning, behaviors that are...
Socioemotional Development during Infancy
Primary Temperament Types
Biological Influences on Intelligence
