Novel approaches to recruiting clinical sites for embedded pragmatic clinical trials: Insights from the AIM-back

Tyler L Cope1,2, Steven Z George1,2,3, S Nicole Hastings2,4,5

  • 1Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA.

Abstract

Insights

Recruiting clinical sites for embedded pragmatic clinical trials (ePCTs) can be complex. The AIM-Back trial successfully recruited 19 sites using a three-step approach, offering insights for future research.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Trials
  • Health Services Research
  • Pragmatic Clinical Trials

Background:

  • Embedded pragmatic clinical trials (ePCTs) are crucial for real-world intervention assessment.
  • Best practices for recruiting clinical sites, particularly new ones, for ePCTs are not well-established.
  • The AIM-Back trial focused on recruiting sites within the Veterans Health Administration (VA) for a low back pain intervention.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe the site recruitment process for the AIM-Back embedded pragmatic clinical trial.
  • To identify challenges and successful strategies for recruiting clinical sites unfamiliar with research.
  • To provide a model for recruiting sites in future ePCTs.

Main Methods:

  • A three-step recruitment approach was employed: lead identification, lead engagement, and virtual meetings.
  • Potential sites were identified through VA contacts, data repositories, and outreach events.
  • Recruitment involved engaging clinicians, administrators, and leadership within VA healthcare systems.

Main Results:

  • 184 leads were identified across 53 VA healthcare systems, with 40 systems responding to outreach.
  • Recruitment meetings were held with 23 systems, leading to participation agreements from 19 sites.
  • The median recruitment timeline from outreach to agreement was 3.7 months; common barriers included resource constraints and competing programs.

Conclusions:

  • The AIM-Back recruitment process highlights the complexities of engaging new clinical research sites for ePCTs.
  • A structured, three-step recruitment strategy can be effective for similar trials.
  • Future ePCTs should prioritize comprehensive strategies to ensure clinician engagement and study feasibility.

Related Concept Videos

Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
6.6K
Blinding01:11

Blinding

Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
2.3K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
106
Blind Procedures02:07

Blind Procedures

Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which...
10.6K