Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 9, 2025

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Novel approaches to recruiting clinical sites for embedded pragmatic clinical trials: Insights from the AIM-back
Tyler L Cope1,2, Steven Z George1,2,3, S Nicole Hastings2,4,5
1Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA.
Background:
Embedded pragmatic clinical trials (ePCTs) assess interventions in real-world settings. Best practices for recruiting clinical sites for ePCTs are unknown, especially for sites that aren't known to the study team or familiar with clinical research. We describe the site recruitment process for AIM-Back, an ePCT of two nonpharmacologic pathways for low back pain within the Veterans Health Administration (VA).
Methods:
During the planning phase of the AIM-Back trial, we aimed to recruit 18-20 sites. Eligible sites required provider capacity, administrative support, and geographic separation to avoid contamination. Our three-step approach involved: (1) lead (VA personnel) identification through existing VA contacts, data repositories of VA clinicians, and promotional outreach at events and listservs; (2) lead engagement via tailored communications emphasizing participation benefits; and (3) virtual meetings with administrators and clinicians.
Results:
We identified 184 leads across 53 VA healthcare systems. Leads from 40 systems responded to outreach, and recruitment meetings were conducted with 23 systems involving primary care, physical therapy, research staff, and leadership. We met our recruitment goal, securing participation agreements from 19 sites, with a median timeline from outreach to participation agreement of 3.7 months. Common reasons for non-participation included infrastructure and resource constraints, resistance to new clinical programs, and competing programs.
Conclusion:
AIM-Back's recruitment highlights ePCT site recruitment complexities for trials engaging new clinical research sites. Our innovative three-step recruitment approach provides an example for similarly designed trials. Future ePCTs should consider comprehensive recruitment strategies to ensure clinician buy-in, study feasibility, and broaden existing networks for completing ePCTs.
Insights
Recruiting clinical sites for embedded pragmatic clinical trials (ePCTs) can be complex. The AIM-Back trial successfully recruited 19 sites using a three-step approach, offering insights for future research.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Trials
- Health Services Research
- Pragmatic Clinical Trials
Background:
- Embedded pragmatic clinical trials (ePCTs) are crucial for real-world intervention assessment.
- Best practices for recruiting clinical sites, particularly new ones, for ePCTs are not well-established.
- The AIM-Back trial focused on recruiting sites within the Veterans Health Administration (VA) for a low back pain intervention.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe the site recruitment process for the AIM-Back embedded pragmatic clinical trial.
- To identify challenges and successful strategies for recruiting clinical sites unfamiliar with research.
- To provide a model for recruiting sites in future ePCTs.
Main Methods:
- A three-step recruitment approach was employed: lead identification, lead engagement, and virtual meetings.
- Potential sites were identified through VA contacts, data repositories, and outreach events.
- Recruitment involved engaging clinicians, administrators, and leadership within VA healthcare systems.
Main Results:
- 184 leads were identified across 53 VA healthcare systems, with 40 systems responding to outreach.
- Recruitment meetings were held with 23 systems, leading to participation agreements from 19 sites.
- The median recruitment timeline from outreach to agreement was 3.7 months; common barriers included resource constraints and competing programs.
Conclusions:
- The AIM-Back recruitment process highlights the complexities of engaging new clinical research sites for ePCTs.
- A structured, three-step recruitment strategy can be effective for similar trials.
- Future ePCTs should prioritize comprehensive strategies to ensure clinician engagement and study feasibility.
More Related Videos
06:28E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
06:32Author Spotlight: Automated Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease - Exploring the Possibilities and Challenges of Home Monitoring
Published on: July 14, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Blinding
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Blind Procedures