Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2026

A Next-generation Tissue Microarray ngTMA Protocol for Biomarker Studies
Published on: September 23, 2014
Comparing Two Gene Expression Profile Tests to Standard of Care for Identifying Patients With Cutaneous Melanoma at
Peter A Prieto1, Laura K Ferris2, Michael J Guenther3
1University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, U.S.A.
Background/Aim:
The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Guidelines for cutaneous melanoma (CM) recommend avoiding sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) when the positivity risk is <5%, considering SLNB when the risk is 5-10%, or offering SLNB when the risk is >10%. Most patients undergoing SLNB have a negative result, showing that reliance upon the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) T-stage alone results in most patients undergoing an unnecessary, negative, unreliable, invasive procedure.
Materials And Methods:
Two gene expression profile (GEP) tests, the CP-GEP and the 31-GEP, have been developed to identify patients at low risk of SLN positivity who may consider avoiding SLNB. We analyzed the accuracy of the CP-GEP and 31-GEP in identifying patients with <5% risk of SLN positivity across the five validation studies of the CP-GEP and four validation studies of the 31-GEP in T1-T2 tumors.
Results:
Patients considered low risk by the CP-GEP had an SLN positivity rate of 6.2%, higher than the risk threshold of 5% used by the NCCN to guide SLNB decisions. In contrast, patients considered low risk by the 31-GEP or i31-SLNB had a 2.8% SLN positivity rate, a substantial improvement over AJCC-staging guidance.
Conclusion:
Overall, the CP-GEP did not perform as well as AJCC, while the 31-GEP performed better than AJCC.
Related Concept Videos
Skin Cancer
Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC): BCC is the most common type of skin cancer, accounting for about 80% of cases. It typically develops in...
Pharmacogenetics of Drug Targets: β₂-Adrenergic Receptors, Apo E, Thymidylate Synthase

