Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2025

A Novel Digital Platform for a Monitored Home-based Cardiac Rehabilitation Program
Published on: April 19, 2019
High-Touch vs Low-Touch Strategy for Implementing a CRC Screening Digital Health Intervention: A Randomized Clinical
David P Miller1,2, Anna C Snavely3, Ajay Dharod1,2
1Department of Implementation Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
A mobile app aimed at increasing colorectal cancer (CRC) screening had low patient usage and did not improve screening rates, even with intensive implementation strategies. Overcoming barriers like staff turnover and fatigue remains a challenge.
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Digital Health Implementation
- Cancer Prevention
Background:
- Low colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates are a significant public health concern.
- Patient, clinician, and system-level barriers impede CRC screening uptake.
- Mobile health (mHealth) apps are explored as a strategy to address these barriers.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate if a more intensive implementation strategy increases the use of a mobile app designed to overcome multilevel barriers to CRC screening.
- To assess the impact of the mHealth app on CRC screening completion rates.
Main Methods:
- A hybrid type 3 effectiveness-implementation pragmatic trial involving 18 primary care practices.
- Practices were randomized to either a low-touch or a high-touch implementation strategy for a CRC screening tablet app.
- Primary outcomes included app reach (percentage of eligible patients completing the app) and effectiveness (CRC test completion within 16 weeks post-implementation).
Main Results:
- Overall patient use of the CRC app was low, decreasing from approximately 5.5% in the first month to 1% by the sixth month, irrespective of implementation intensity.
- High-touch implementation showed a trend towards increased use of the CheckIn app (OR, 2.8) and CRC app (OR, 1.7) compared to low-touch, though not statistically significant for CheckIn.
- No significant difference in CRC screening completion rates was observed after app implementation compared to the pre-implementation cohort (OR, 0.9).
Conclusions:
- Patient-facing mHealth apps for CRC screening demonstrated low utilization and did not improve screening completion rates, regardless of implementation intensity.
- Persistent challenges such as staff turnover, post-pandemic fatigue, workflow complexities, and time constraints may limit the effectiveness of implementation strategies.
- Further research is needed to identify more effective strategies for integrating digital health tools into routine cancer screening workflows.
More Related Videos
06:28E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
06:16Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Blinding
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Preventive Healthcare Services