Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 9, 2025

07:13
Modified Experimental Conditions for Noise-Induced Hearing Loss in Mice and Assessment of Hearing Function and Outer Hair Cell Damage
Published on: February 10, 2023
2.1K
Machine Learning Models Can Predict Tinnitus and Noise-Induced Hearing Loss.
Zahra Jafari1,2,3,4,5, Ryan E Harari6,7,5, Glenn Hole8
1School of Communication Sciences and Disorders (SCSD), Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Ear and Hearing
|May 6, 2025
Summary
Machine learning models effectively differentiate tinnitus and hearing loss types. Artificial neural networks excelled at predicting tinnitus, while random forest models accurately distinguished noise-induced from age-related hearing loss.
Area of Science:
- Auditory science
- Medical artificial intelligence
- Diagnostic technology
Background:
- Machine learning (ML) applications in health sciences are widespread for prediction and classification.
- However, ML's use in differentiating auditory disorders is limited.
- This study addresses the gap in diagnosing tinnitus and distinguishing between noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) and age-related hearing loss (ARHL).
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of five ML models in distinguishing tinnitus from non-tinnitus.
- To assess ML models' ability to differentiate NIHL from ARHL.
- To identify optimal ML models for auditory disorder diagnostics.
Main Methods:
- Utilized data from 928 Canadian adults (30-100 years) with diagnosed ARHL or NIHL.
- Applied five ML models: artificial neural networks (ANNs), K-nearest neighbors, logistic regression, random forest (RF), and support vector machines.
- Analyzed audiologic and demographic data, focusing on hearing loss patterns and tinnitus prevalence.
Main Results:
- Tinnitus prevalence was over double in the NIHL group (27.85% constant, 18.55% intermittent) compared to ARHL (8.85% constant, 10.86% intermittent).
- NIHL showed significantly greater hearing loss at medium- and high-band frequencies versus ARHL.
- ANN achieved 70% accuracy for tinnitus prediction; RF achieved 90% AUC for NIHL vs. ARHL differentiation.
Conclusions:
- ML models, particularly ANN and RF, enhance diagnostic precision for tinnitus and NIHL.
- Findings suggest a framework for integrating ML into clinical audiology.
- Future research should expand datasets and incorporate longitudinal data for broader applicability.

