Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 9, 2025

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
Published on: June 21, 2018
Navigating Pharmacogenomic Testing in Practice: Who to Test and When to Test
James M Stevenson1,2, D Max Smith3,4, Sony Tuteja5
1Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing offers personalized medication management but faces adoption barriers due to inconsistent guidelines and unclear patient selection criteria. This review explores factors influencing PGx testing decisions and models for implementation.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacogenomics
- Clinical Pharmacology
- Personalized Medicine
Background:
- Increasing interest in pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing for individualized medication management.
- Limited routine PGx testing recommendations in clinical practice guidelines, hindering adoption.
- Inconsistencies in guidelines, FDA labeling, and reimbursement policies impede widespread use.
Purpose of the Study:
- To discuss critical considerations for determining who should receive PGx testing and when.
- To explore factors beyond clinical validity, including actionable result frequency and alternative treatments.
- To present perspectives on identifying PGx testing candidates in real-world clinical settings.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing resources and clinical practice guidelines related to PGx testing.
- Discussion of various considerations for PGx testing candidate selection.
- Analysis of different PGx testing models: preemptive, pretreatment, and reactive testing.
Main Results:
- Multiple factors influence PGx testing decisions, including clinical validity, actionable result frequency, adverse outcome severity, predictive power, alternative treatments, cost, and turnaround time.
- Existing resources often lack guidance on patient selection for PGx testing.
- Different testing models (preemptive, pretreatment, reactive) have distinct advantages and disadvantages.
Conclusions:
- Addressing the question of 'who' and 'when' for PGx testing is crucial for clinical adoption.
- A comprehensive approach considering multiple factors beyond drug-gene interactions is necessary.
- Real-world candidate identification for PGx testing requires careful consideration of practical and clinical factors.
More Related Videos
07:15Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation
Published on: January 16, 2019
13:24Integration of Wet and Dry Bench Processes Optimizes Targeted Next-generation Sequencing of Low-quality and Low-quantity Tumor Biopsies
Published on: April 11, 2016