Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 9, 2025
Endoscopic Septoplasty with Limited Two-line Resection: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Septal Deviation
Published on: June 20, 2018
Surgeon Case Volume Impacts Revision Rate of Endoscopic Sinus Surgery
Daniel J Lee1,2, Chungah Kim3, Mauz Asghar4
1Division of Rhinology, Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Unity Health Toronto - St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Introduction:
Previous studies have demonstrated a positive relationship between surgeon volume and patient outcomes. While this relationship has been established in oncologic, bariatric, and orthopedic surgeries, little is known in the realm of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). The objective was to assess the association between a surgeon's ESS annual volume and rates of revision surgery within 5 years as well as 30-day complications for patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS).
Methods:
We identified CRS patients in Ontario, Canada, who underwent primary ESS, using surgeon-level administrative data between 2014 and 2018 (N = 13,562). Surgeon volume was calculated based on the number of procedures performed in the previous year by the surgeon and was divided into quartiles. We identified those who underwent revision ESS within the subsequent 5-year period. Complications were defined as unplanned hospital admission or emergency department visit within the first 30 days following the operation. A multivariate regression model was used to estimate the effect of surgeon volume on revision rate.
Results:
An unadjusted model demonstrated that high surgeon volume quartile (> 63/year) was associated with lower rates of revision surgery and 30-day hospitalization (p < 0.05 for both) along with a higher rate of complete ESS (p < 0.001). After controlling for patient/surgeon covariates and extent of ESS, low-volume surgeons (1-17/year) remained an independent statistically significant predictor of revision surgery (hazard ratios [HR]: 1.60, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.17-2.19).
Conclusion:
Our study is the first to demonstrate a surgeon volume-outcome relationship in ESS. Being a high-volume surgeon is predictive of a lower revision rate in CRS patients undergoing ESS.
