Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2025
Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example
Published on: October 24, 2012
Accelerated ultrashort echo time quantitative magnetization transfer (UTE-qMT) imaging of macromolecular fraction
Kevin Du1, Harry Tang1, Jiyo Athertya1
1Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.
Purpose:
To combine ultrashort echo time quantitative magnetization transfer (UTE-qMT) imaging with a self-attention convolutional neural network (SAT-Net) for accelerated mapping of macromolecular fraction (MMF) in cortical bone.
Materials And Methods:
This institutional review board-approved study involved 31 young female subjects (young control, <45 years) and 50 postmenopausal subjects (6 normal (old control), 14 with osteopenia (osteopenia group), and 30 with osteoporosis (OP group)). After written informed consent was obtained from each subject, 15 UTE-qMT images of the tibial midshaft were acquired with three saturation powers (500°, 1000°, and 1500°) and five frequency offsets (2, 5, 10, 20, and 50 kHz) for each power to estimate the baseline MMF using a two-pool model. The densely connected SAT-Net model was used to predict bone MMF maps based on seven evenly distributed UTE-qMT images, which were well separated in terms of MT powers and frequency offsets (namely 5 and 20 kHz for 500° and 1500°, and 2, 10, 50 kHz for 1000°). Errors relative to the baseline MMF were calculated. Linear regression was used to assess the performance of the SAT-Net model. The mean MMF values for different groups were calculated.
Results:
Conventional two-pool modeling of seven evenly distributed UTE-qMT input images shows a significant relative error of ∼34 %. In comparison, the SAT-Net model accurately predicted MMF values for the tibial midshafts of 81 human subjects with a high correlation (R2 = 0.97, P < 0.0001) between the baseline and predicted values. The SAT-Net model accelerated UTE-qMT data acquisition by 2.1-fold, with relative errors in MMF mapping less than 2.4 %. The average MMF values were 46.10 ± 13.25 % for the young control group, 40.03 ± 2.56 % for the old control group, 31.22 ± 13.18 % for the osteopenia group, and 22.53 ± 8.12 % for the OP group.
Conclusion:
While it is difficult to accelerate MMF mapping in bone using conventional two-pool modeling, the SAT-Net model allows accurate MMF mapping with a substantial reduction in the number of UTE-qMT input images. UTE-qMT with SAT-Net makes clinical evaluation of bone matrix possible.
