Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2025

Experimental Methods for Trapping Ions Using Microfabricated Surface Ion Traps
Published on: August 17, 2017
Inhibiting concentration quenching in Yb3+-Tm3+ upconversion nanoparticles by suppressing back energy transfer
Dingxin Huang1,2, Feng Li1,2, Hans Ågren1,3
1MIIT Key Laboratory of Critical Materials Technology for New Energy Conversion and Storage, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, 150001, PR China.
Abstract:
Lanthanide-doped upconversion nanoparticles are promising for applications ranging from biosensing, bioimaging to solid-state lasing. However, their brightness remains limited by the concentration quenching effect of lanthanide activator ions, which greatly restricts their utility. Here, we develop a heterogeneous core-shell-shell nanostructure based on hexagonal NaYF4, in which Tm3+ activator and Yb3+ sensitizer are separated into the core and inner shell, while the outmost shell is used to suppress surface quenching effects. We show that this design can alleviate the activator concentration quenching effect, resulting in optimal Tm3+ concentration increasing from 1% to 8% at sub-100 W/cm2 irradiance, compared with the canonical core-only NaYF4:Yb3+/Tm3+. Moreover, under high excitation irradiance (20 MW/cm2), the optimal Tm3+ concentration could be further increased to 50%. Mechanistic investigations reveal that the spatial separation of sensitizer and activator effectively suppresses the back energy transfer from Tm3+ to Yb3+, driving the increase of optimal activator concentration. These findings enhance our understanding of lanthanide concentration quenching effect, unleashing opportunities for developing bright upconverting materials.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
EDTA: Auxiliary Complexing Reagents
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than...

