Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 2, 2026

Vessel-sparing Excision and Primary Anastomosis
Published on: January 7, 2019
Long-Term Urologic Outcomes Using the Big Ben Method for Phalloplasty
Jens Urs Berli1,2, Peter C Ferrin3, Carter Buuck4
1From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.
Background:
There are many ways to construct a urethra in gender-affirming phalloplasty, and comparing outcomes presents challenges because of the diversity of surgical techniques and staging methods in this low-volume procedure. A frequent criticism of phalloplasty is the high rate of urologic complications and associated impact on patient outcomes.
Methods:
This retrospective, single-surgeon study focuses on long-term outcomes of urethral creation using the Big Ben 2-stage method for urethral lengthening. This study was conducted in 73 patients between December of 2016 and September of 2023, who had at least 6 months' follow-up. Surgical outcomes-specifically, rates of urethral fistulas and strictures-were assessed along with patient-reported outcome measures obtained through distributed surveys.
Results:
Seventy-three patients underwent first-stage phalloplasty with the goal of urethral lengthening at the second-stage operation, with 96% achieving standing urination and 4% being converted to a perineal urethrostomy. The total percentage of patients experiencing a urologic complication was 27%. Of the 71 patients who did proceed with the second stage, 8% formed a stricture and 16.4% formed a urethrocutaneous fistula. One patient experiencing a stricture was converted to a perineal urethrostomy. There were no mucoceles or urethral, ureteral, or bowel injuries associated with the colpectomy/colpoclesis. Patient-reported satisfaction was high, with 96% expressing willingness to undergo the procedure again (response rate, 67%).
Conclusions:
The Big Ben method demonstrated potential in reducing urethral stricture rates compared with alternative approaches. It further allows mitigation of complication severity and impact on quality of life, and has a high degree of patient satisfaction and ability to achieve the goal of standing urination. It is particularly well suited for a multidisciplinary academic setting.
Clinical Question/Level Of Evidence:
Therapeutic, IV.

