Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2025

Single-cell RNA Sequencing and Analysis of Human Pancreatic Islets
Published on: July 18, 2019
Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Outperforms Single-Nucleus RNA Sequencing in Analyzing Pancreatic Cell Diversity and Gene
Jie Cheng1,2, Tianxi Zhang1,2, Yan Cheng1,2
1National Engineering Laboratory for Pollution Control and Waste Utilization in Livestock and Poultry Production, South-Central Experimental Station of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science in Ministry of Agriculture, Hunan Provincial Engineering Research Center for Healthy Livestock and Poultry Production, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha 410125, China.
Abstract:
The objective of this study was to determine whether single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) or single-nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNA-seq) was more effective for studying the goat pancreas. Pancreas tissues from three healthy 10-day-old female Xiangdong black goats were processed into single-cell and single-nucleus suspensions. These suspensions were then used to compare cellular composition and gene expression levels following library construction and sequencing. Both scRNA-seq and snRNA-seq were eligible for primary analysis but produced different cell identification profiles in pancreatic tissue. Both methods successfully annotated pancreatic acinar cells, ductal cells, alpha cells, beta cells, and endothelial cells. However, pancreatic stellate cells, immune cells, and delta cells were uniquely annotated by scRNA-seq, while pancreatic stem cells were uniquely identified by snRNA-seq. Furthermore, the genes related to digestive enzymes showed a higher expression in scRNA-seq than in snRNA-seq. In the present study, scRNA-seq detected a great diversity of pancreatic cell types and was more effective in profiling key genes than snRNA-seq, demonstrating that scRNA-seq was better suited for studying the goat pancreas. However, the choice between scRNA-seq and snRNA-seq should consider the sample compatibility, technical differences, and experimental objectives.

