Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

Spatial Measurements of Perfusion, Interstitial Fluid Pressure and Liposomes Accumulation in Solid Tumors
Published on: August 18, 2016
Exploring the Challenges of Lipid Nanoparticle Development: The In Vitro-In Vivo Correlation Gap
Sarah Lindsay1, Muattaz Hussain1, Burcu Binici1
1Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, 161 Cathedral Street, Glasgow G4 0RE, UK.
Lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) show variable in vitro and in vivo mRNA expression, impacting clinical translation. Comprehensive evaluation is crucial for optimizing LNP delivery systems for therapeutics and vaccines.
Area of Science:
- Biotechnology
- Nanomedicine
- Drug Delivery
Background:
- Lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) are advanced delivery platforms for nucleic acids, revolutionizing therapeutic and vaccine development.
- Challenges in reliable in vitro-in vivo correlation (IVIVC) hinder the clinical translation of LNP-based technologies.
- This study addresses IVIVC discrepancies by evaluating LNP physicochemical properties, in vitro efficacy, and in vivo performance.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate discrepancies in in vitro-in vivo correlation (IVIVC) for LNP formulations.
- To evaluate the impact of different ionizable lipids on LNP performance.
- To assess LNP potential for mRNA delivery and vaccine applications.
Main Methods:
- Four LNP formulations were manufactured using microfluidics, differing in their ionizable lipids (SM-102, ALC-0315, MC3, C12-200).
- Physicochemical properties (size, PDI, zeta potential, encapsulation) were analyzed.
- In vitro mRNA expression was assessed across three cell lines.
- In vivo mRNA expression and vaccine efficacy were evaluated.
Main Results:
- All LNPs demonstrated comparable physicochemical properties (70-100 nm size, low PDI, high encapsulation).
- In vitro, SM-102 LNPs showed significantly higher protein expression (p < 0.05) in immortalized and immune cells.
- In vivo, ALC-0315 and SM-102 LNPs yielded significantly higher protein expression (p < 0.05), with no difference between them; MC3 and C12-200 showed lower expression.
- All LNP formulations elicited comparable strong immune responses as vaccine candidates.
Conclusions:
- Significant variability exists in correlating in vitro and in vivo outcomes for LNP development.
- Ionizable lipid choice critically influences LNP in vivo mRNA expression but not vaccine efficacy.
- Holistic evaluation strategies are essential for optimizing LNP clinical translation.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Lipid-derived Compounds in the Human Body
Fat-soluble Vitamins
Fat-soluble vitamins, including vitamins A, D, E, and K, are required in minimal quantities, but their deficiencies can lead to severely abnormal physiological conditions. For example, vitamin A deficiency can cause night blindness, dry skin,...
Methods for Studying Drug Absorption: In vitro
The diffusion cell method uses a two-compartment cell, including a donor compartment with the drug solution, which simulates the environment where the drug is applied, and a receptor compartment with a buffer solution, which simulates the environment...
Equivalence: In Vitro and In Vivo Bioequivalence
In Vitro Drug Release Testing: Overview, Development and Validation
Drug Product Performance: In Vitro–In Vivo Correlation
Modified-Release Drug Delivery Systems: Bioavailability

