Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Weighted Mean00:57

Weighted Mean

4.8K
While taking the arithmetic, geometric, or harmonic mean of a sample data set, equal importance is assigned to all the data points. However, all the values may not always be equally important in some data sets. An intrinsic bias might make it more important to give more weightage to specific values over others.
For example, consider the number of goals scored in the matches of a tournament. While computing the average number of goals scored in the tournament, it may be more important to...
4.8K
Confidence Coefficient01:24

Confidence Coefficient

7.4K
The confidence coefficient is also known as the confidence level or degree of confidence. It is the percent expression for the probability, 1-α, that the confidence interval contains the true population parameter assuming that the confidence interval is obtained after sufficient unbiased sampling; for example, if the CL = 90%, then in 90 out of 100 samples the interval estimate will enclose the true population parameter. Here α is the area under the curve, distributed equally under...
7.4K
Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean01:25

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean

7.2K
A point estimate of the population mean is obtained from a single sample. Such a point estimate does not represent a population well because it needs to account for variability in the population. Single point estimate can also be biased despite the sample being selected randomly. Thus, a point estimate is often unreliable. A confidence interval is needed to reduce this unreliability.
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
7.2K
Confidence Intervals01:21

Confidence Intervals

6.0K
An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a  sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval  contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A...
6.0K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

553
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
553
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

5.5K
A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
5.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Adaptive inference through Bayesian and inverse Bayesian inference with symmetry bias in nonstationary environments.

Bio Systems·2026
Same author

Strain amplitude sweep testing of oscillatory shear of transient networks with controlled network structures.

Science and technology of advanced materials·2026
Same author

Association between psychological stress and REM/NREM sleep among urban white-collar workers: A multilevel analysis using ecological momentary assessment and Fitbit data.

Chronobiology international·2026
Same author

ME-BYO index as a formative construct for healthy ageing: a cross-sectional PLS-SEM analysis.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Response: Commentary: The ME-BYO index: a development and validation project of a novel comprehensive health index.

Frontiers in public health·2025
Same author

Association between sedentary behavior and sleep quality among urban white-collar workers with or at risk of metabolic syndrome: a secondary analysis of a randomized 3-month workplace lifestyle intervention trial.

Journal of occupational health·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 12, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.0K

Simple modification of the upper confidence bound algorithm by generalized weighted averages.

Nobuhito Manome1,2, Shuji Shinohara1,3, Ung-Il Chung1

  • 1Department of Bioengineering, Graduate School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Plos One
|May 7, 2025
PubMed
Summary

A new algorithm, Generalized Weighted Average Upper Confidence Bound 1 (GWA-UCB1), enhances sequential decision-making in reinforcement learning. This GWA-UCB1 algorithm outperforms existing methods in various multi-armed bandit problem settings.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Optimization of Processing Technology for Tiebangchui with Zanba Based on CRITIC Combined with Box-Behnken Response Surface Method
09:16

Author Spotlight: Optimization of Processing Technology for Tiebangchui with Zanba Based on CRITIC Combined with Box-Behnken Response Surface Method

Published on: May 12, 2023

1.0K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

9.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 12, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.0K
Author Spotlight: Optimization of Processing Technology for Tiebangchui with Zanba Based on CRITIC Combined with Box-Behnken Response Surface Method
09:16

Author Spotlight: Optimization of Processing Technology for Tiebangchui with Zanba Based on CRITIC Combined with Box-Behnken Response Surface Method

Published on: May 12, 2023

1.0K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

9.8K

Area of Science:

  • Reinforcement Learning
  • Machine Learning
  • Artificial Intelligence

Background:

  • The multi-armed bandit (MAB) problem is a fundamental challenge in reinforcement learning, focusing on sequential decision-making under uncertainty.
  • Existing algorithms like UCB1 provide a baseline for balancing exploration and exploitation, but advancements are needed for diverse applications.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a novel generalized Upper Confidence Bound algorithm, GWA-UCB1, designed to improve upon the UCB1 algorithm for MAB problems.
  • To provide a flexible and easily implementable algorithm that generalizes the exploration-exploitation trade-off in UCB1.
  • To evaluate the performance of GWA-UCB1 across various stochastic and survival MAB problem settings.

Main Methods:

  • The study proposes the GWA-UCB1 algorithm, which extends UCB1 using generalized weighted averages.
  • Preliminary experiments involved investigating optimal parameters for GWA-UCB1 and a simpler G-UCB1 variant.
  • Algorithm performance was validated on stochastic MAB problems with uniform/normal reward distributions and survival MAB problems.

Main Results:

  • GWA-UCB1 demonstrated superior performance compared to G-UCB1, UCB1-Tuned, and Thompson sampling across most tested scenarios.
  • The algorithm's effectiveness was confirmed in both stochastic and more realistic survival MAB problem settings.
  • Optimal parameters for GWA-UCB1 and G-UCB1 were identified through preliminary investigations.

Conclusions:

  • GWA-UCB1 offers a robust and effective solution for multi-armed bandit problems, outperforming established algorithms.
  • The algorithm's simple modification of the UCB1 formula allows for easy integration into existing UCB-based reinforcement learning models.
  • GWA-UCB1 is a valuable tool for various applications requiring efficient sequential decision-making under uncertainty.