Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 23, 2025

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
References Supporting Recommendations in Obstetrical Green Top Guidelines: An Overview of RCOG Clinical Guidelines
Halime Meryem Soylu1, Hector Mendez-Figueroa2, Suneet P Chauhan3
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Queens Hospital Center, New York, New York.
Abstract:
Green-top Guidelines (GTGs) by the Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (RCOG) guide clinical practices similar to Practice Bulletins (PBs) by the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG). Previous analyses reveal that most recommendations lack Grade A evidence and are not based on randomized clinical trials (RCTs). This descriptive study evaluates the quality of evidence supporting RCOG Obstetrical recommendations.We reviewed obstetrical RCOG GTGs available as of September 2024, checking each citation in PubMed for RCT status. Quality assessments were not made independently. The senior author verified a random 10% of the data (B.J.F.H.). Data were recorded and summarized in Excel.RCOG lists 37 obstetrical GTGs with 1,861 recommendations. About 1,288 (69%) of recommendations are supported by 3,674 references. A total of 43% of GTGs rely on consensus and expert opinion. When omitting recommendations based on expert opinion, 98 (9%) of RCOG recommendations are Grade A (based on high-quality evidence), and of the cited references, 5% of GTGs are Evidence Level 1 + + (highest quality), while 7% are RCTs.Among the recommendations, 69% of GTGs have identifiable references. However, 43% of GTG references are nonanalytical studies or expert opinions. Our findings highlight the need for more high-quality evidence in guidelines and suggest further research in evidence-based obstetrical care. · Of 1,861 obstetrical recommendations, 69% cite references, but 43% rely on expert opinion.. · Only 9% of the GTGs meet Grade A standards, showing limited high-quality references.. · About 43% of the guidelines are based on clinical experience, with 5% having the highest evidence strength.. · Only 7% of references come from RCTs.. · The research highlights the need for stronger, evidence-based guidelines..
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Standards of Care II
Standards of Care I
Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Respiratory Assessment: Purpose and Indications
Objectives and Importance:
The primary goal of respiratory assessment is to evaluate patients at early risk of clinical deterioration. Since respiratory distress often precedes other signs of declining health, breathing patterns and sounds become a...

