Microplastic pellets in Arctic marine sediments: a common source or a common process?

  • 1Norwegian Polar Institute, Fram Centre, 9296-Tromsø, Norway; Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NIVA), Fram Centre, 9296-Tromsø, Norway. Electronic address: france.collard@niva.no.
  • 2Norwegian Polar Institute, Fram Centre, 9296-Tromsø, Norway.
  • 3NILU, Fram Centre, 9296-Tromsø, Norway.
  • 4Norwegian Polar Institute, Fram Centre, 9296-Tromsø, Norway; NILU, Fram Centre, 9296-Tromsø, Norway.
  • 5Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NIVA), Fram Centre, 9296-Tromsø, Norway; NILU, Fram Centre, 9296-Tromsø, Norway.
  • 6UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Department of Geosciences, Tromsø, Norway.
  • 7University of Padova, Department of Chemical Sciences, Padova, Italy.

|

Abstract

Plastic consumption is increasing, and millions of tonnes of plastic are released into the oceans every year. Plastic materials are accumulating in the marine environment, especially on the seafloor. The Arctic is contaminated with plastics, including microplastics (MPs, <5 mm) but occurrences, concentrations and fate are largely unknown. This study aimed at assessing whether MPs accumulate at greater water depths in the Barents Sea, and close to the Longyearbyen settlement, and at understanding the ubiquity and source of a specific type of collected pellets. Surface sediments were collected at seven stations around Svalbard with a box-corer, and three replicates were taken at each station. MPs were extracted through density separation with saturated saltwater. Many pellets were found, and their composition was assessed by pyrolysis-GC/MS. Procedural blanks were performed using field blanks as samples to assess the overall contamination. The composition of all extracted particles was then analysed by microRaman spectroscopy. On average, 3.61 ± 1.45 MPs/100 g (dw) were found. The sea ice station, after blank correction, was more contaminated and displaying a different profile than the other stations, and the deepest station did not show the highest MP concentrations but rather the opposite. Sediments close to Longyearbyen were not more contaminated than the other stations either. Dark pellets of similar aspect were found at all stations, raising the question about a possible common source or process. These pellets were made of several plastic polymers which varied in proportion for each pellet, suggesting a common process was at the origin of those pellets, potentially marine snow formation.