Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2026

The Dyspepsia Educational Tool As a Novel Aid in Dyspepsia Management
Published on: June 29, 2019
Rapid cycle, randomised testing of precision feedback to improve engagement with a process measure dashboard amongst
Patrick Lewicki1, Bassel Salka2, Stephanie Daignault-Newton2
1Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA lewickip@med.umich.edu.
Introduction:
Rapid-cycle randomised testing holds high potential to enhance quality improvement practice but remains under-utilised because it requires significant resource commitment. However, infrastructure for learning networks, such as collaborative quality initiatives and large-scale quality improvement consortia, holds potential to support rapid-cycle testing at low cost and with minimal effort. For example, rapid-cycle randomised testing could be used to optimise 'precision feedback', which prioritises highly motivating tailored content to improve engagement with audit and feedback. We combined these concepts (rapid cycle, randomised testing and precision feedback) with a low-resource emphasis in conceiving this trial.
Methods And Analysis:
A stepped wedge randomised controlled trial will deliver an intervention consisting of precision feedback and modifications to audit and feedback communication to 100 urologists performing ureteroscopy within the Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative (MUSIC) and will be compared with a control consisting of standard 'one-size-fits-all' audit and feedback. The study's primary endpoint is online dashboard engagement, measured as the clickthrough rate through the tracking of embedded links in emails. The stent rate following pre-stented ureteroscopy will also be measured. The primary hypothesis is that precision feedback will increase engagement with an audit and feedback dashboard and decrease rates of stenting following pre-stented ureteroscopy. Endpoints will be analysed by linear modelling accounting for repeated measures within individuals, exploring the primary hypothesis through a main effect by the study arm.
Ethics And Dissemination:
Ethics and regulatory approval have been obtained from the Institutional Review Board of the University of Michigan (HUM#00248876). The findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and conferences.
Trial Registration Number:
ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT06465667. Registered 6/20/2024.
More Related Videos
06:05The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
06:46Author Spotlight: Enhanced Urodynamic Method for Precise Urine Measurement in Awake Mice with Neurogenic Bladder
Published on: June 7, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Blinding
Urodynamic Studies: Uroflowmetry