Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Complexation Equilibria: Factors Influencing Stability of Complexes01:09

Complexation Equilibria: Factors Influencing Stability of Complexes

316
In complexation reactions, metal cations are the electron pair acceptors, and the ligands are the electron pair donors. The stability of the metal complexes depends primarily on the complexing ability of the central metal ion and the nature of the ligands. Generally, the complexing ability of the metal ion depends on the size and charge of the ion. As the metal ion size increases, the stability of the metal complexes decreases, provided that the valency of the metal ion and the ligands remain...
316
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength02:18

The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength

12.7K
The equilibrium binding constant (Kb) quantifies the strength of a protein-ligand interaction. Kb can be calculated as follows when the reaction is at equilibrium:
12.7K
Complexometric Titration: Ligands00:43

Complexometric Titration: Ligands

869
Different monodentate and polydentate ligands are used as complexing agents in complexometric titration reactions. The formation of complexes by mono- and bidentate ligands involves two or more intermediate steps, limiting their use as complexing agents. In comparison, polydentate ligands can form complexes with metal ions in a single-step process, facilitating sharper end points. This means polydentate ligands, such as amino carboxylic acid derivatives, are most commonly employed in...
869
Ladder Diagrams: Complexation Equilibria01:07

Ladder Diagrams: Complexation Equilibria

305
Ladder diagrams are useful for evaluating equilibria involving metal-ligand complexes. The vertical scale of the ladder diagram represents the concentration of unreacted or free ligand, pL. The horizontal lines on the scale depict the log of stepwise formation constants for metal-ligand complexes and indicate the dominant species in all the regions.
The formation constant, K1, for the formation of Cd(NH3)2+ complex from cadmium and ammonia is 3.55 × 102. Log K1 (i.e. pNH3) is 2.55, and...
305
Complexation Equilibria: Overview01:23

Complexation Equilibria: Overview

594
Complexation reactions take place when dative or coordinate covalent bonds form between metal ions and ligands. The compounds formed in these reactions are called coordination compounds. The number of bonds formed between the metal ion and the ligands is called its coordination number. Generally, most metal ions in an aqueous solution are solvated by water molecules and thus exist as aqua complexes.
The equilibrium constant of the complexation reaction is represented as the formation constant...
594
Ligand Binding Sites02:40

Ligand Binding Sites

12.6K
Proteins are dynamic macromolecules that carry out a wide variety of essential processes; however, the activities of most proteins depend on their interactions with other molecules or ions, known as ligands.
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
12.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Conformational Control in C2-Substituted Benzimidazolium-Based Ionic Liquids Enables Superior TcO<sub>4</sub><sup><b><sup>-</sup></b></sup> Separation from Simulated High-Level Liquid Waste.

Inorganic chemistry·2026
Same author

Molecular Representation Matters: Comparative Evaluation of Fingerprints, RDKit Descriptors, and Hashing Effects.

The journal of physical chemistry letters·2026
Same author

A Force Field Model for Actinyl Cations AnO<sub>2</sub><sup>2+</sup> and AnO<sub>2</sub><sup>+</sup> (An = U, Np, Pu) Comparable with the AMOEBA Polarizable Force Field.

Inorganic chemistry·2025
Same author

Synthesis and Evaluation of Hydrophilic 1,10-Phenanthroline Derivative for the Separation of Scandium(III) and Yttrium(III).

Inorganic chemistry·2025
Same author

Revealing an Unexpected Chemical Reactivity of Boron Nitride to H<sub>2</sub>O and Alkane Molecules.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2025
Same author

In Situ Formation of B═O Bond in Oxidative Dehydrogenation of Propane and as a Hunter for Alkoxyl Radicals: A Computational Study.

The journal of physical chemistry letters·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 23, 2025

Determination of Protein-ligand Interactions Using Differential Scanning Fluorimetry
13:26

Determination of Protein-ligand Interactions Using Differential Scanning Fluorimetry

Published on: September 13, 2014

61.5K

Prediction of Actinide-Ligand Complex Stability Constants by Machine Learning.

Junhong Li1, Junqing Li1, Ziyi Liu1,2

  • 1State Key Laboratory of Fine Chemicals, Liaoning Key Laboratory for Catalytic Conversion of Carbon Resources, School of Chemistry, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China.

The Journal of Physical Chemistry. A
|May 8, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Machine learning accurately predicts actinide-ligand binding affinities, accelerating the design of novel ligands for nuclear energy applications. This approach identifies key properties, improving sequestration strategies and reducing experimental efforts.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA
10:21

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA

Published on: February 23, 2024

2.3K
Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions
06:50

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions

Published on: January 26, 2024

1.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 23, 2025

Determination of Protein-ligand Interactions Using Differential Scanning Fluorimetry
13:26

Determination of Protein-ligand Interactions Using Differential Scanning Fluorimetry

Published on: September 13, 2014

61.5K
Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA
10:21

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA

Published on: February 23, 2024

2.3K
Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions
06:50

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions

Published on: January 26, 2024

1.1K

Area of Science:

  • Nuclear chemistry and materials science.
  • Computational chemistry and machine learning.

Background:

  • Efficient sequestration of actinides is crucial for sustainable nuclear energy.
  • Current ligand design relies on slow, labor-intensive trial-and-error methods, hindered by actinide toxicity and radioactivity.
  • Machine learning offers a promising alternative for accelerating ligand discovery.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop accurate machine learning models for predicting actinide-ligand binding affinities (log K1).
  • To identify key physicochemical descriptors influencing these interactions.
  • To demonstrate the utility of machine learning in designing novel ligands for actinides.

Main Methods:

  • Trained 14 machine learning algorithms using binding equilibrium constants (log K1) as the target property.
  • Identified the 15 most relevant descriptors from a set of 282, covering ligands, metals, and solvents.
  • Utilized the Gradient Boosting model for prediction and the SISSO model for quantitative correlation.

Main Results:

  • The Gradient Boosting model achieved high accuracy, with R2 values of 0.98 on the training set and 0.93 on the test set.
  • Identified key physicochemical properties influencing actinide-ligand interactions.
  • Successfully predicted binding affinities for new ligands with experimental agreement.

Conclusions:

  • Machine learning models, particularly Gradient Boosting, can accurately predict actinide-ligand binding affinities.
  • This study provides fundamental insights into actinide-ligand interactions and their governing properties.
  • Machine learning-assisted design accelerates the discovery of effective ligands for actinide sequestration.