Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2025

The C-seal: A Biofragmentable Drain Protecting the Stapled Colorectal Anastomosis from Leakage
Published on: November 4, 2010
Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) and secondary repair (overlapping sphincteroplasty) in a colorectal unit:
Abdel Latif Khalifa Elnaim1, Michael Pak Kai Wong2, Ismail Sagap3
1Department of Surgery, Kassala Police Hospital, Kassala, Sudan.
Insights
Overlapping sphincteroplasty effectively treats delayed obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS), improving incontinence symptoms. Prevention and early recognition of OASIS remain crucial for optimal maternal outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Surgical Gastroenterology
- Pelvic Floor Disorders
Background:
- Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) are a significant childbirth complication with varying global incidence.
- Overlapping sphincteroplasty is the standard surgical treatment, but managing delayed or inadequate repairs presents challenges.
- Prevention and early detection of OASIS are key to reducing its impact.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the clinical outcomes of overlapping sphincteroplasty in patients with delayed or missed OASIS.
- To evaluate the efficacy of delayed surgical intervention for OASIS.
Main Methods:
- A case series of 12 female patients with symptoms of incontinence after instrumental delivery and episiotomy.
- Preoperative and postoperative assessment using the Wexner scoring system.
- Overlapping sphincteroplasty performed, with follow-up at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years.
Main Results:
- All 12 patients showed symptomatic improvement, with reduced Wexner scores and high satisfaction.
- The average duration of symptoms before surgery was 14 months.
- Complications included superficial wound breakdown (25%) and one deep wound breakdown; however, no incontinence was reported at 2-year follow-up.
Conclusions:
- Delayed overlapping sphincteroplasty is effective for missed or inadequately repaired OASIS, yielding satisfactory results.
- Despite surgical success, prioritizing prevention and early recognition of OASIS through improved obstetric care is essential.
Background:
Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) represent a significant complication of childbirth, with global variation in incidence. Although overlapping sphincteroplasty is widely regarded as the gold-standard surgical treatment, managing delayed or inadequately repaired cases remains challenging. Prevention through improved obstetric practices and early recognition of injuries is considered the optimal approach to minimizing the burden of OASIS.
Objectives:
This case series aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of overlapping sphincteroplasty in patients presenting with delayed or missed OASIS.
Methods:
The study included 12 female patients treated at a single institution over 4 years. All participants had a history of instrumental delivery and episiotomy, with symptoms of incontinence. Preoperative and postoperative assessments were performed using the Wexner scoring system. Overlapping sphincteroplasty was performed in all cases. Follow-up was conducted at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years to evaluate symptomatic improvement and patient satisfaction.
Results:
The mean age of the participants was 38 years (range: 26-53 years). All patients experienced symptomatic improvement following surgery, with significant reductions in the Wexner scores and high patient satisfaction rates. The mean duration of symptoms before surgery was 14 months (3-36 months). Complications included a 25% rate of superficial wound breakdown and one case of deep wound breakdown requiring secondary repair. Despite this, no incontinence symptoms were reported at the 2-year follow-up.
Conclusions:
Delayed overlapping sphincteroplasty is an effective surgical approach for treating missed or inadequately repaired OASIS, offering satisfactory outcomes. However, prevention through improved obstetric practices remains an optimal strategy.
Related Concept Videos
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical Manifestations:

