Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 3, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
The Quality of Methodological Reporting of Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) Articles Published in Iranian and Top
Razieh Bagherzadeh1, Siavash Asadzadeh Jahanabad2, Leila Dehghani2
1Midwifery Faculty of Bushehr, University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran.
Introduction:
The quality of methodological reporting in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is crucial for guiding healthcare decisions. This study compares the methodological reporting of RCT articles published in Iranian nursing and midwifery journals indexed in Scopus with those published in international nursing and midwifery journals also indexed in Scopus.
Methods:
This comparative cross-sectional study reviewed RCT articles from eight Iranian Scopus- indexed journals (381 articles) and three journals with the highest CiteScore index (204 articles) from 2017 to 2021. Data were collected using the methodology section of the CONSORT checklist. SPSS 19 software was used for data analysis.
Results:
The average percentages of methodological reporting in the top three Iranian journals were 76.4% and 84.4%. The mean quality score of methodological reporting in Iranian nursing and midwifery journals was significantly lower than that in international journals published from 2017-2021 (P <0.001). Underreporting was observed in both groups, particularly regarding randomization and blinding.
Discussion:
Our findings align with previous studies indicating that adherence to reporting standards, such as CONSORT guidelines, is more common in higher-impact journals. Deficiencies in reporting elements, such as randomization and blinding, undermine confidence in study results.
Conclusion:
The average quality of methodological reporting in Iranian journals is lower than that in the top three Scopus-indexed journals. Journals with lower reporting quality, like Iranian journals, can enhance article quality by adhering to reporting guidelines for all article types, including RCTs.
More Related Videos
10:38Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies
Published on: January 16, 2019
06:05The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Chi-square Analysis
The chi-square test was developed by Pearson in 1990.
The first step of performing a Chi-square analysis is to establish a null hypothesis, which assumes that there is no real...
Nursing Assessment
The nurse collects all aspects of the patient's health in the initial assessment, establishing priorities for ongoing focused assessments and...
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Nursing Clinical Information System
A Nursing Clinical Information System (NCIS) is a specialized type of healthcare information system tailored to meet the unique needs of nursing practice. It incorporates the principles of nursing informatics to streamline information management and improve the quality of care delivery.
Critical attributes of NCIS include:
The Scientific Method in Nursing Process
When using research findings to change practice, one must understand the process used to guide a study. The scientific method is a systematic, step-by-step process that supports the data's validity, reliability, and generalizability. As a result, findings can be safely...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...