Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 1, 2026

Infinium Assay for Large-scale SNP Genotyping Applications
Published on: November 19, 2013
Investigating SNP typing using alternative reference materials with the FORCE panel and QIAseq® chemistry
Lindsay L Kotchey1, Sophie Lee2, Leah Nangeroni1
1The Center for Forensic Science Research & Education, Horsham, PA 19440, USA.
Abstract:
Advancements in forensic science have introduced single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers as crucial tools in kinship, ancestry, and identity testing, and in predicting phenotypic traits. The emergence of Forensic Genetic Genealogy (FGG) and massively parallel sequencing (MPS) technologies have further enhanced the utility of SNP markers, generating interest in their application within the forensic community. The FORensic Capture Enrichment (FORCE) panel, targeting 5497 SNPs including those associated with ancestry, phenotype, identity, and kinship, is specifically designed for direct kinship comparisons and the recovery of autosomal markers for direct identification in cases where traditional short tandem repeat (STR) typing is unsuitable. This study aimed to evaluate alternative reference materials-hair roots, hair shafts, and fingernail clippings-using the FORCE panel and QIAseq® chemistry for direct identification. We assessed SNP recovery and concordance between these materials and buccal swabs, and we compared predictions for phenotype, Y-haplogroup, and biogeographic ancestry. Additionally, the study examined the concordance and performance on two sequencing platforms: MiSeq FGx and NextSeq 550. Our results demonstrated high (99.62-100 %) SNP concordance rates between alternative reference materials and buccal swabs, with fingernail samples showing the highest SNP recovery and concordance of the alternate reference materials. Phenotypic, ancestry, and Y-haplogroup ancestry predictions from alternative materials were 100 % consistent with those from buccal samples. However, some discrepancies in phenotype predictions were noted when comparing predictions to self-reported data. Both sequencing platforms provided comparable results, with NextSeq 550 mid-output kit offering 3.5X higher coverage and potential cost-saving advantages through greater sample multiplexing. In conclusion, the FORCE panel, combined with QIAseq® chemistry, effectively profiles SNPs from various alternative reference materials, offering reliable concordance and comprehensive genotype recovery even from low-input and degraded samples. This highlights its potential application in forensic investigations where traditional reference samples are unavailable.
Related Concept Videos
Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms-SNPs

