Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
Hook effect although rare, still exists
Giulia Napoli1, Simone Leggeri2, Carla Lombardi1
1Unit of Chemistry, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, "A. Gemelli" Hospital Foundation IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli, 8, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Background:
The hook effect occurs when extremely high concentrations of an analyte in the sample, saturate the antibodies used in the method, leading to falsely low results.
Case:
We describe a case observed with the Atellica IM 1600 (Siemens) analyzer for the measurement of human chorionic gonadotropin (β-HCG) in serum of a pregnant woman at the thirteenth week of pregnancy.
Discussion:
The β-HCG result was inconsistent with the gestational age and helped us to highlight the hook effect and supported the clinical diagnosis of vesicular mole in the patient. The same sample was also analyzed using the Alinity-i Total β-hCG kit (Abbott), and the authors highlight how differences between diagnostic kits can significantly affect the analytical result.
Conclusions:
In cases of discrepancies between laboratory data and clinical findings, it is essential to consult with laboratory specialists to rule out analytical interferences. To minimize the risk of the hook effect, we modified the analytical procedure and submitted a report to Siemens European Support.
More Related Videos
05:22Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: May 9, 2019
11:30Unravelling the Function of a Bacterial Effector from a Non-cultivable Plant Pathogen Using a Yeast Two-hybrid Screen
Published on: January 20, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Cause and Effect
Social Proof
Framing Effects
Social Loafing
Impact Loading
In cases of elastic deformation,...
Serial Position Effect