Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2025

08:50
A Nonsequencing Approach for the Rapid Detection of RNA Editing
Published on: April 21, 2022
2.5K
Predicting adenine base editing efficiencies in different cellular contexts by deep learning
Lucas Kissling1, Amina Mollaysa2, Sharan Janjuha1
1Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Genome Biology
|May 9, 2025
Summary
Adenine base editors (ABEs) can correct pathogenic mutations. This study validates ABEs in vivo and introduces BEDICT2.0, a deep learning model predicting editing efficiency for improved therapeutic development.
Area of Science:
- Gene editing technologies
- Molecular biology
- Bioinformatics
Background:
- Adenine base editors (ABEs) facilitate A•T to G•C conversions.
- Predictive models for base editing efficiency are limited by in vitro data.
- In vivo predictive power for primary cells remains uncertain.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate adenine base editing efficiency in vitro and in vivo.
- To develop a predictive computational model for base editing outcomes.
- To assess the potential of ABEs for correcting pathogenic mutations.
Main Methods:
- Conducted base editing screens using SpRY-ABEmax and SpRY-ABE8e.
- Targeted 2,195 pathogenic mutations across cell lines and murine liver models.
- Developed BEDICT2.0, a deep learning model for predicting editing efficiencies.
Main Results:
- Observed strong correlations between in vitro and in vivo base editing datasets (Spearman R = 0.83-0.92).
- BEDICT2.0 accurately predicted adenine base editing efficiencies in cell lines (R = 0.60-0.94) and liver (R = 0.62-0.81).
- Demonstrated high on-target editing with minimal bystander effects.
Conclusions:
- Adenine base editing shows significant potential for correcting numerous pathogenic mutations.
- BEDICT2.0 is a robust computational tool for optimizing sgRNA-ABE combinations.
- The findings support the use of ABEs for in vitro and in vivo therapeutic applications.
Related Concept Videos
RNA Editing
8.8K
RNA editing is a post-transcriptional modification where a precursor mRNA (pre-mRNA) nucleotide sequence is changed by base insertion, deletion, or modification. The extent of RNA editing varies from a few hundred bases, in mitochondrial DNA of trypanosomes, to a just single base, in nuclear genes of mammals. Even a single base change in the pre-mRNA can convert a codon for one amino acid into the codon for another amino acid or a stop codon. This type of re-coding can significantly affect the...
8.8K
Proofreading
53.5K
Overview
53.5K
Improving Translational Accuracy
8.5K
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
8.5K

