Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

RNA Editing02:23

RNA Editing

8.8K
RNA editing is a post-transcriptional modification where a precursor mRNA (pre-mRNA) nucleotide sequence is changed by base insertion, deletion, or modification. The extent of RNA editing varies from a few hundred bases, in mitochondrial DNA of trypanosomes, to a just single base, in nuclear genes of mammals. Even a single base change in the pre-mRNA can convert a codon for one amino acid into the codon for another amino acid or a stop codon. This type of re-coding can significantly affect the...
8.8K
Proofreading01:43

Proofreading

53.5K
Overview
53.5K
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

8.5K
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
8.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Non-invasive wood moisture sensing for arthropod infestation prevention using a circularly polarized high-isolation antenna system.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

BPTF is essential for vaccine-induced germinal center B cell responses.

Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)·2026
Same author

Directed evolution of compact RNA-guided nucleases for enhanced activity in mammalian cells.

Genome biology·2026
Same author

Clonal dynamics of germinal center refueling by secondary immunization.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Early antifungal resistance prediction based on MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry and machine learning.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Prime editing of a pathogenic <i>Scn1a</i> allele ameliorates seizure phenotypes in a GEFS<sup>+</sup> mouse model.

Science translational medicine·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 12, 2025

A Nonsequencing Approach for the Rapid Detection of RNA Editing
08:50

A Nonsequencing Approach for the Rapid Detection of RNA Editing

Published on: April 21, 2022

2.5K

Predicting adenine base editing efficiencies in different cellular contexts by deep learning.

Lucas Kissling1, Amina Mollaysa2, Sharan Janjuha1

  • 1Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Genome Biology
|May 9, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Adenine base editors (ABEs) can correct pathogenic mutations. This study validates ABEs in vivo and introduces BEDICT2.0, a deep learning model predicting editing efficiency for improved therapeutic development.

Keywords:
CRISPR-Cas9 genome editingGenomicsIn vivoMachine learningMouse

More Related Videos

Efficient PAM-Less Base Editing for Zebrafish Modeling of Human Genetic Disease with zSpRY-ABE8e
07:31

Efficient PAM-Less Base Editing for Zebrafish Modeling of Human Genetic Disease with zSpRY-ABE8e

Published on: February 17, 2023

1.1K
Functional Assessment of BRCA1 variants using CRISPR-Mediated Base Editors
09:22

Functional Assessment of BRCA1 variants using CRISPR-Mediated Base Editors

Published on: February 28, 2021

5.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 12, 2025

A Nonsequencing Approach for the Rapid Detection of RNA Editing
08:50

A Nonsequencing Approach for the Rapid Detection of RNA Editing

Published on: April 21, 2022

2.5K
Efficient PAM-Less Base Editing for Zebrafish Modeling of Human Genetic Disease with zSpRY-ABE8e
07:31

Efficient PAM-Less Base Editing for Zebrafish Modeling of Human Genetic Disease with zSpRY-ABE8e

Published on: February 17, 2023

1.1K
Functional Assessment of BRCA1 variants using CRISPR-Mediated Base Editors
09:22

Functional Assessment of BRCA1 variants using CRISPR-Mediated Base Editors

Published on: February 28, 2021

5.4K

Area of Science:

  • Gene editing technologies
  • Molecular biology
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Adenine base editors (ABEs) facilitate A•T to G•C conversions.
  • Predictive models for base editing efficiency are limited by in vitro data.
  • In vivo predictive power for primary cells remains uncertain.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate adenine base editing efficiency in vitro and in vivo.
  • To develop a predictive computational model for base editing outcomes.
  • To assess the potential of ABEs for correcting pathogenic mutations.

Main Methods:

  • Conducted base editing screens using SpRY-ABEmax and SpRY-ABE8e.
  • Targeted 2,195 pathogenic mutations across cell lines and murine liver models.
  • Developed BEDICT2.0, a deep learning model for predicting editing efficiencies.

Main Results:

  • Observed strong correlations between in vitro and in vivo base editing datasets (Spearman R = 0.83-0.92).
  • BEDICT2.0 accurately predicted adenine base editing efficiencies in cell lines (R = 0.60-0.94) and liver (R = 0.62-0.81).
  • Demonstrated high on-target editing with minimal bystander effects.

Conclusions:

  • Adenine base editing shows significant potential for correcting numerous pathogenic mutations.
  • BEDICT2.0 is a robust computational tool for optimizing sgRNA-ABE combinations.
  • The findings support the use of ABEs for in vitro and in vivo therapeutic applications.