Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 13, 2025

FISH for Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis
Published on: February 23, 2011
Artificial intelligence in clinical genetics: current practice and attitudes among the clinical genetics workforce
Amanda M Berkstresser1, Suzanna E Ledgister Hanchard2, Daniela Iacaboni1
1Genetic Counseling Program, School of Health & Natural Sciences, Bay Path University, Longmeadow, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Purpose:
Artificial intelligence (AI) applications for clinical genetics hold the potential to improve patient care through supporting diagnostics and management as well as automating administrative tasks, thus enhancing and potentially enabling clinician/patient interactions. While the introduction of AI into clinical genetics is increasing, there remain unclear questions about risks and benefits, and the readiness of the workforce.
Methods:
To assess the current clinical genetics workforce's use, knowledge, and attitudes toward available medical AI applications, we conducted a survey involving 215 US-based genetics clinicians and trainees.
Results:
Over half (51.2%) of participants report little to no knowledge of AI in clinical genetics and 64.3% reported no formal training in AI applications. Formal training directly correlated with self-reported knowledge of AI in clinical genetics, with 69.3% of respondents with formal training reporting intermediate to extensive knowledge of AI vs. 37.5% without formal training. Most participants reported that they lacked sufficient knowledge of clinical AI (83.4%) and agreed that there should be more education in this area (97.6%) and would take a course if offered (89.3%). The majority (51.6%) of clinician participants said they never used AI applications in the clinic. However, after a tutorial describing clinical AI applications, 75.8% reported some use of AI applications in the clinic. When asked specifically about clinical AI application usage, the majority of clinician participants used facial diagnostic applications (54.9%) and AI-generated genomic testing results (62.1%), whereas other applications such as chatbots, large language models (LLMs), pedigree or medical summary generators, and risk assessment were only used by a fraction of the clinicians, ranging from 11.1 to 12.5%. Nearly all participants (94.6%) reported clinical genetics professionals as being overburdened.
Conclusion:
Further clinician education is both desired and needed to optimally utilize clinical AI applications with the potential to enhance patient care and alleviate the current strain on genetics clinics.
More Related Videos
09:30Pre-Implantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy on a Semiconductor Based Next-Generation Sequencing Platform
Published on: August 17, 2022
07:15Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation
Published on: January 16, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Human Genetics
The complex relationship between genetics and psychology is observable through common biological components such...
What is Genetic Engineering?
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Behavioral Genetics and Its Designs
The primary methodologies used in behavior genetics include family studies, twin studies, and adoption studies, each providing unique...
Current Trends in Nursing II
Genetic Screens
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which...