Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bonferroni Test01:10

Bonferroni Test

2.7K
The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
2.7K
Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

3.8K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
3.8K
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test01:09

Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test

1.4K
The t-test is a statistical method used to compare the sample mean with a population mean or compare two means from two data sets. The test statistic is calculated from the standard deviation, mean, and number of measurements in the data set at a selected confidence interval and then compared to a table of critical values at this confidence level. If the test statistic is smaller than the critical value, the null hypothesis is accepted. In this case, we state that the difference between the...
1.4K
Types of Hypothesis Testing01:11

Types of Hypothesis Testing

26.0K
There are three types of hypothesis tests: right-tailed, left-tailed, and two-tailed.
When the null and alternative hypotheses are stated, it is observed that the null hypothesis is a neutral statement against which the alternative hypothesis is tested. The alternative hypothesis is a claim that instead has a certain direction. If the null hypothesis claims that p = 0.5, the alternative hypothesis would be an opposing statement to this and can be put either p > 0.5, p < 0.5, or p...
26.0K
Sign Test for Matched Pairs01:17

Sign Test for Matched Pairs

86
The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
86
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

3.9K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
3.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pilot Study: Vancomycin Calcium Sulfate Beads in the Prevention of Recurrent Capsular Contracture of Breast Implants.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open·2026
Same author

Test-Negative Designs With Multiple Testing Sources.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Constructing a Literature-Derived Database for Benchmarking Polygenic Risk Score Construction Methods with Spectral Ranking Inferences.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Test-negative Designs with Various Reasons for Testing: Statistical Bias and Solution.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2025
Same author

RANDOMIZATION INFERENCE FOR CLUSTER-RANDOMIZED TEST-NEGATIVE DESIGNS WITH APPLICATION TO DENGUE STUDIES: UNBIASED ESTIMATION, PARTIAL COMPLIANCE, AND STEPPED-WEDGE DESIGN.

The annals of applied statistics·2025
Same author

Spatiotemporal effects on dengue incidence based on a large cluster randomized study.

Statistical methods in medical research·2025
Same journal

HIV Transmission Dynamics in Greater Mexico City are Shaped by Dense Spatial Mixing.

Research square·2026
Same journal

A UCP1-IRES-Cre Knock-In Mouse Enables Specific Brown Adipocyte Targeting Without CNS Off-Target Expression.

Research square·2026
Same journal

Precision RNAi for Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva: a combinatorial, unimolecular, allele selective approach.

Research square·2026
Same journal

Perceptions of end-of-life care quality among bereaved closest contacts of community-dwelling older Australians: a cross-sectional survey of the ASPREE cohort.

Research square·2026
Same journal

Heavy-chain immune repertoire sequencing enables language-model prediction of antigen-specific antibodies.

Research square·2026
Same journal

25+ Years of TRPV4: From Discovery to Translational Horizons.

Research square·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 20, 2025

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
05:53

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 21, 2018

10.1K

Test-Negative Designs with Multiple Testing Sources.

Mengxin Yu1, Nicholas P Jewell2

  • 1Department of Statistics and Data Science, University of Pennsylvania, PA, United States.

Research Square
|May 9, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Test-negative designs effectively evaluate vaccine efficacy. This study addresses bias from multiple testing reasons, proposing a method for Ebola vaccine trials to ensure accurate efficacy assessment.

Keywords:
Case-cohort studyEbolaTest-negative design

More Related Videos

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
00:08

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

Published on: September 4, 2019

6.9K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

3.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 20, 2025

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
05:53

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 21, 2018

10.1K
A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
00:08

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

Published on: September 4, 2019

6.9K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

3.8K

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Vaccinology
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Test-negative designs (TNDs) are common for assessing infectious disease interventions like vaccines.
  • TNDs traditionally reduce confounding from healthcare-seeking behavior by testing symptomatic individuals.
  • Recent challenges include bias from aggregating symptomatic and asymptomatic test results, particularly for diseases like COVID-19 and Ebola.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the 'multiple reasons for testing problem' in TNDs.
  • To propose a method for estimating vaccine efficacy using combined symptomatic and asymptomatic test results.
  • To assess if vaccine efficacy is consistent across different testing sources.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a modified TND approach for an Ebola Viral Disease (EVD) vaccine trial.
  • Incorporated testing of close contacts of symptomatic, test-positive individuals.
  • Developed a statistical method to estimate common vaccine efficacy from dual testing sources.

Main Results:

  • The study proposes a method to estimate vaccine efficacy from symptomatic and asymptomatic cases.
  • The approach allows for assessing if efficacy differs between these two groups.
  • While the EVD trial concluded early, the methodology remains relevant for future vaccine efficacy studies.

Conclusions:

  • A refined TND approach can mitigate bias from multiple testing reasons.
  • Accurate assessment of vaccine efficacy requires accounting for diverse testing scenarios.
  • The proposed method is crucial for future infectious disease vaccine trials, especially during outbreaks.