Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 17, 2025

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
Published on: February 16, 2011
Examining the Relationship Between Relative Value Units and Patient-reported Outcomes: Implications for Value-based
Justin J Turcotte1, Jane C Brennan, Andrea H Johnson
1From the Luminis Health Anne Arundel Medical Center Orthopedics, Annapolis, MD.
Introduction:
Compensation based on work relative value unit (wRVU) production is common among orthopaedic surgeons. With increased adoption of value-based payments, a greater portion of surgeon compensation will be linked to quality and outcome measures-including patient-reported outcomes. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the relationship between wRVUs and changes in Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Physical Function (PROMIS-PF) scores to assess whether wRVUs could serve as a marker of patient-reported functional improvements.
Methods:
A retrospective review of 2,996 orthopaedic surgeries at a single institution was done. Patient characteristics, total wRVUs billed by the surgeon for the case, operating room (OR) time, and change in PROMIS-PF scores from baseline to 6 months postoperatively were compared across subspecialties. Pearson correlation and multivariable linear regression were used to assess the relationship between wRVUs, OR time, and PROMIS-PF change.
Results:
Statistically significant differences in average wRVUs, OR times, and PROMIS-PF scores were observed across subspecialties. A strong positive correlation between wRVUs and OR time existed ( r = 0.732, P < 0.001) that explained approximately 54% of OR-time variability. A weak positive correlation between wRVUs and change in PROMIS-PF scores was observed ( r = 0.058, P = 0.002) that explained <1% of the variation. Each 1-point increase in wRVU was associated with a 3-minute increase in surgical duration (β = 3.04, P < 0.001) after controlling for demographics, comorbidities, and subspecialty, accounting for approximately 63% of OR-time variation. Each 1-point increase in wRVU was independently associated with a 0.02-point increase in PROMIS-PF change (β = 0.02, P = 0.036), explaining approximately 7% of the variation.
Conclusion:
Across orthopaedic subspecialties, notable variability in both wRVUs and physical function improvements at 6 months postoperatively exists. Although highly correlated with surgical time, wRVUs show little association with functional improvement across subspecialties. As the transition toward value-based payment models continues, measurement of and compensation for work complexity and functional outcomes must remain separate and distinct.
More Related Videos
03:47Author Spotlight: Workflow for Integrating POCUS Data into EHR for Managing Heart Failure Patients
Published on: July 12, 2024
06:05The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Relative Risk
Patient-centered Care
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Ratio Level of Measurement
A set of data measured using the ratio scale takes care of the ratio problem and provides complete information. Ratio scale data are like interval scale data, except they have a zero point and ratios can be calculated....
Nursing Evaluation