Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 13, 2025

A Bioluminescent and Fluorescent Orthotopic Syngeneic Murine Model of Androgen-dependent and Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer
Published on: March 6, 2018
A randomized, open-label, multi-center, active-controlled phase II study comparing abiraterone acetate tablets (II),
Xiaolin Lu1, Tao Dai2, Xue Chen2
1Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Background:
Abiraterone is a 17α-hydroxylase/C17-20 lyase inhibitor used for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). This multi-center, randomized, open-label, active-controlled phase II study compared the pharmacodynamics (PD), pharmacokinetics (PK), and safety of abiraterone acetate tablets (II) (AAT[II]), a new formulation of abiraterone acetate, and ZYTIGA®, the originator abiraterone acetate (OAA), in patients with metastatic CRPC.
Methods:
Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive 300 mg AAT(II) daily plus 5 mg prednisone twice daily or 1000 mg OAA daily plus 5 mg prednisone twice daily for 84 days. The primary endpoint was the serum testosterone level (rounded-up) on Day 9 and/or Day 10. Absolute testosterone concentration, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration, steady-state PK of abiraterone, and safety were also evaluated.
Results:
Sixty-nine patients were enrolled in the study, with 35 assigned to AAT(II) and 34 to OAA. The least squares (LS) mean (standard error) of serum testosterone concentration (rounded-up) on Day 9 and/or Day 10 were 1.075 (0.034) and 1.000 (0.034) in the AAT(II) and OAA groups, respectively. The geometric mean ratio (AAT[II] vs. OAA) was 1.053 (90% confidence interval [CI], 0.998 to 1.110) and the LS mean difference was 0.075 (95% CI, -0.021 to 0.171). The 90% CI fell within the 80.0% to 125.0% equivalence limits, suggesting equivalent PD effect of the two formulations. AAT(II) also exhibited high testosterone inhibition rate (> 90% at all visits) and PSA-50 rate (> 65% on Days 56 and 84), which were comparable to that of OAA. AAT(II) also demonstrated an improved safety profile with lower incidence of adverse events compared to OAA.
Conclusions:
AAT(II) at 300 mg plus prednisone demonstrated equivalent PD as OAA at 1000 mg plus prednisone in reducing serum testosterone on Day 9 and/or Day 10, and the effect was maintained up to the end of the study. Compared to OAA, AAT(II) was given at a much lower dosage and was not affected by food consumption. AAT(II) was well tolerated, and no new safety issues were found.
Trial Registration:
ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04862091.
Related Concept Videos
Bioequivalence: Overview
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...

