Antigen presentation potential is variable among human ovarian tumour and syngeneic murine models and dictates pre-clinical outcomes of immunotherapy
- Louisa Alim 1, Siddharth Adityan 1, Rui Chen 1, Trent Neilson 1, Elaina Coleborn 1, Andrew N Wilkinson 1, Yaowu He 2, Gowri Irgam 1, Chintan Bhavsar 1, Rohan Lourie 3, Rebecca Rogers 3, Nimithri Cabraal 3, Nisha Jagasia 3, Naven Chetty 3, Lewis Perrin 3, John D Hooper 4, Raymond Steptoe 5, Sherry Y Wu 1
- Louisa Alim 1, Siddharth Adityan 1, Rui Chen 1
- 1School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia.
- 2Mater Research Institute - The University of Queensland, Translational Research Institute, Woolloongabba, Queensland 4102, Australia.
- 3Mater Ovarian Cancer Research Collaborative, Mater Adult Hospital, South Brisbane, Queensland 4101, Australia; Mater Health Services, South Brisbane, Queensland 4101, Australia.
- 4Mater Research Institute - The University of Queensland, Translational Research Institute, Woolloongabba, Queensland 4102, Australia; Mater Ovarian Cancer Research Collaborative, Mater Adult Hospital, South Brisbane, Queensland 4101, Australia.
- 5Frazer Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
- 0School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.High grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSC) immunotherapy response depends on antigen presentation machinery (APM). MHC-I expression predicts treatment success, guiding better preclinical models and patient stratification for ovarian cancer.
Area Of Science
- Oncology
- Immunology
- Genetics
Background
- High grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSC) presents limited therapeutic options, with immunotherapy showing promise.
- Effective immunotherapy relies on MHC-I-dependent antigen presentation, but the antigen presentation machinery (APM) in HGSC models is poorly understood.
- This limits the translational relevance of preclinical studies for HGSC.
Purpose Of The Study
- To systematically evaluate APM gene expression in syngeneic murine HGSC models and patient tumors.
- To identify critical APM markers and correlate murine models with patient subsets.
- To assess the efficacy of a novel combination immunotherapy in HGSC models with varying APM status.
Main Methods
- Systematic evaluation of APM gene expression in murine HGSC models and patient samples.
- Identification of Tap1 and Psmb8 as critical APM markers.
- Hierarchical clustering correlation analysis to align murine models with patient subsets.
- In vivo testing of a combination immunotherapy (Flt3L, Poly(I:C), paclitaxel).
Main Results
- Tap1 and Psmb8 were identified as key APM markers, often deficient in murine models, correlating with MHC-I expression.
- ID8-p53⁻/⁻BRCA1⁻/⁻ and ID8-ip1 models showed strong correlation with distinct patient subsets.
- The combination immunotherapy significantly reduced tumor burden in high APM models (ID8-p53⁻/⁻BRCA1⁻/⁻, ID8-ip1) but not in the low MHC-I IG10 model.
- High MHC-I expression correlated with enhanced immune cell activity, including DC expansion, CD8⁺ T-cell infiltration, and activation.
Conclusions
- MHC-I serves as a predictive biomarker for immunotherapy response in HGSC.
- APM-enhancing strategies are crucial for improving immunotherapy in antigen-poor HGSC tumors.
- This study provides a framework for optimizing preclinical immunotherapy evaluation and patient stratification in HGSC.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.

