Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 13, 2025
Measurement of Pulse Propagation Velocity, Distensibility and Strain in an Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Mouse Model
Published on: February 23, 2020
The Essential Difference in Measuring Health Status and Quality of Life in Patients with an Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
B Gjosha1, W van Wel2, J de Vries3
1Department of Vascular Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands.
Background:
Quality of life (QoL) and health status (HS) are important patient-reported outcomes following abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. In current literature, HS questionnaire outcomes are often reported as health-related QoL, although they primarily measure functional outcomes. The literature on actual QoL in AAA patients is limited. This study evaluated QoL and HS in AAA patients after aneurysm repair, including both open surgical repair (OSR) and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR).
Methods:
This prospective observational cohort study included AAA patients from a prehabilitation program between 2018 and 2022. QoL was assessed using the WHOQOL-BREF, and HS using the SF-12 questionnaire, at baseline (before surgery), 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively. Changes in QoL and HS over time were evaluated using linear mixed models that adjusted for sex and type of surgery.
Results:
Of the 91 included patients, 38 underwent OSR and 53 underwent EVAR, with a mean age of 76.7 years. Compared to baseline, overall QoL was significantly lower at 12 months follow-up (mean difference -0.24, P = 0.023). Group analysis revealed a significant decline in overall QoL in EVAR patients only. No significant change in QoL following OSR was observed. No significant change in HS was observed in either group.
Conclusion:
The findings suggest that the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire is more appropriate for evaluating QoL in AAA patients. Overall QoL, rather than HS, significantly declined between baseline and postoperative follow-up in older prehabilitated AAA patients, especially after EVAR. Understanding the impact of surgical interventions beyond traditional HS measures is crucial for shared decision-making and value-based healthcare.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
01:23Assessment of the Cardiovascular System I: Subjective Data
Initial Enquiry
Ask the patient about their primary concern and thoroughly explore all reported symptoms.
Medical History
Investigate past illnesses affecting the cardiovascular system, such as angina, anemia, rheumatic fever, congenital heart disease, stroke, thrombophlebitis, dysrhythmias, varicosities
Inquire about symptoms...
01:20Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
01:28Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
01:25Assessment of the Abdomen I: Inspection and Auscultation
The abdominal examination is a cornerstone of clinical medicine, serving as a critical tool in diagnosing various gastrointestinal (GI) diseases. It involves a systematic approach that includes inspection and auscultation, each with distinct yet complementary roles in assessing the abdomen. This article will delve into these two primary methods healthcare professionals use to examine the abdomen.
Inspection of the Abdomen
The first step in any abdominal examination is inspection....
01:21Sites for measruring blood pressure
The Brachial Artery: Primary Site for Blood Pressure Measurement
01:17Pulse amplitude and quality
A weak or absent pulse may indicate reduced cardiac output or poor left ventricular contraction, which can be signs of cardiovascular dysfunction or...