Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 13, 2025

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
Published on: April 22, 2015
Cutoff Points for Commonly Used Instruments to Assess Mental Health Problems Among Adults With Tourette's Syndrome
Rachael Nicholls1, Tamara Pringsheim1, Davide Martino1
1Departments of Psychiatry (Nicholls, Hao, Fletcher) and Clinical Neurosciences (Pringsheim, Martino, Szejko), University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Mathison Center for Mental Health Education and Research, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada (Pringsheim); Department of Bioethics, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw (Szejko).
Objective:
Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, depression, and anxiety are highly comorbid in Tourette's syndrome. Cutoff points of screening instruments for these conditions have been validated in the general population. The authors assessed whether established cutoff points on the General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) scale; Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9); PHQ-2; Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale, version 1.1 (ASRS v1.1); and Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory (OCI) need to be adjusted for adults with Tourette's syndrome.
Methods:
Thirty-six adults with Tourette's syndrome completed these instruments and a diagnostic psychiatric interview. Measures of diagnostic accuracy were calculated (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC], sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio) for each instrument at various cutoffs. Cutoffs for the sample of adults with Tourette's syndrome were suggested by the lowest value derived from a Euclidean distance method.
Results:
In this sample of adults with Tourette's syndrome, the optimal cutoff points were a GAD-7 score ≥13 (sensitivity, 67%; specificity, 91%; and AUC, 79%), a PHQ-9 score ≥15 (sensitivity, 67%; specificity, 73%; and AUC, 70%), a PHQ-2 score ≥3 (sensitivity, 67%; specificity, 67%; and AUC, 67%), an ASRS v1.1 score ≥14 (sensitivity, 83%; specificity, 77%; and AUC, 80%), and an OCI score ≥63 (sensitivity, 70%; specificity, 89%; and AUC, 79%). The best-performing instrument was the ASRS v1.1, followed by the GAD-7 and OCI; the PHQ-9 and PHQ-2 performed least well in this population.
Conclusions:
Further research is needed to adapt screening instruments for the assessment of comorbid conditions among patients with Tourette's syndrome.
More Related Videos
05:48The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
Published on: June 12, 2020
08:07Traditional Trail Making Test Modified into Brand-new Assessment Tools: Digital and Walking Trail Making Test
Published on: November 23, 2019