Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Predator-Prey Interactions

Predator-Prey Interactions

Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.

Sustainable Development

Sustainable Development

As the human population continues to grow and use resources, we must be mindful of our planet’s natural limits. Sustainable development provides a pathway to maintain and improve human life now while also ensuring that future generations will have the resources that they need. The long-term success of sustainability efforts rests on understanding the interplay between human actions and ecological systems.

Psychology as a Science

Psychology as a Science

Psychology, as a scientific discipline, aims to understand the mind and behavior through rigorous and systematic methods. The foundation of psychological research is evidence-based, relying heavily on the scientific method to derive and validate knowledge. This structured approach ensures that findings are reliable, valid, and applicable to broader contexts.
The scientific method in psychology involves six critical steps: making observations, formulating hypotheses, conducting tests, analyzing...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Enhancing clinical skills and interprofessional collaboration: exploring the benefits of visual thinking strategies in a pediatric hospital setting.

Journal of interprofessional care·2026

Same author

Do One Health Networks Compete, Coordinate, or Both? Insights from a Cross-Network Dialogue.

EcoHealth·2026

Same author

Expanding Training Capacity for the Group-Based Social ABCs Program: Evaluation of Coaching Models and French-Language Implementation in a Pediatric Hospital.

Autism : the international journal of research and practice·2026

Same author

A rapid tool for understanding how knowledge users engage with research findings in research-for-development contexts.

Health research policy and systems·2026

Same author

Pork safety across Vietnam's traditional markets: Microbial contamination and vendor knowledge, attitudes, and practices.

Preventive veterinary medicine·2025

Same author

Revealing Solvent-Assisted Li<sup>+</sup> Transport in the Solid Electrolyte Interphase <i>operando</i>.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2025

Same journal

Job performance among health professionals in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Public health reviews·2026

Same journal

Transformative public health education - are we there, yet?

Public health reviews·2026

Same journal

Diplomatic monocultures in public health diplomacy: a narrative review on conference equity, participation and visibility.

Public health reviews·2026

Same journal

A realist review to understand the complexity of effective management of type 2 diabetes and hypertension.

Public health reviews·2026

Same journal

From tokenism to youth leadership in child and adolescent mental health research.

Public health reviews·2026

Same journal

Defining Competencies for Policymaking in Public Health: A Scoping Review on the State-of- The-Art.

Public health reviews·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 14, 2025

Digital Microfluidics for Automated Proteomic Processing

Digital Microfluidics for Automated Proteomic Processing

Published on: November 6, 2009

Engaging Scientists in Science Policy: Experiences From Canada.

Steven Lâm¹, Sarah Raza², Lisa Hansen²

¹International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Nairobi, Kenya.

Public Health Reviews

|May 12, 2025

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Science policy training is vital for informed decision-making, yet opportunities are scarce. This analysis highlights the value of fellowships in developing policy skills and urges continued support for training future science policy leaders.

Keywords:

environmental scan evaluation fellowship public health science policy scientist training

More Related Videos

Seawater Sampling and Collection

Seawater Sampling and Collection

Published on: June 17, 2009

Assessing the Multiple Dimensions of Engagement to Characterize Learning: A Neurophysiological Perspective

Assessing the Multiple Dimensions of Engagement to Characterize Learning: A Neurophysiological Perspective

Published on: July 1, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 14, 2025

Digital Microfluidics for Automated Proteomic Processing

Digital Microfluidics for Automated Proteomic Processing

Published on: November 6, 2009

Seawater Sampling and Collection

Seawater Sampling and Collection

Published on: June 17, 2009

Assessing the Multiple Dimensions of Engagement to Characterize Learning: A Neurophysiological Perspective

Assessing the Multiple Dimensions of Engagement to Characterize Learning: A Neurophysiological Perspective

Published on: July 1, 2015

Area of Science:

Science policy
Interdisciplinary research

Background:

Limited opportunities exist for scientists to receive science policy training.
Effective scientific advice for decision-making requires trained scientists.

Purpose of the Study:

To share experiences from a postgraduate science policy fellowship.
To advocate for continued science policy training opportunities.
To encourage financial support for graduate students in science policy.

Main Methods:

Qualitative reflection on fellowship experiences.
Analysis of skills gained and career pathways accessed.

Main Results:

Fellowship refined practical policy skills.
Enabled contributions to policy outputs.
Opened career pathways beyond academia.

Conclusions:

Continued science policy training is essential.
Rigorous evaluation should inform program development.
Increased financial support for graduate students is needed.
Scientists and students should engage more in policy spaces.