Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 14, 2025

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools
Published on: June 20, 2020
Effect of gestational age on special education: a population-based matched cohort analysis
Tessa de Baat1, Anita C J Ravelli2,3, Cornelieke S H Aarnoudse-Moens4
1Department of Neonatology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands t.debaat@amsterdamumc.nl.
Insights
Children born earlier, especially extremely preterm, have a significantly higher risk of using special education. This increased risk persists even in late preterm and early-term births, highlighting the long-term impact of gestational age.
Area of Science:
- Perinatal epidemiology
- Developmental pediatrics
- Special education research
Background:
- Gestational age is a critical determinant of neonatal outcomes.
- Understanding the long-term educational consequences of preterm birth is essential for early intervention.
- Previous studies have indicated a link between prematurity and developmental challenges.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association between gestational age and special education use in primary school-aged children.
- To identify specific risk factors that exacerbate special education needs in relation to gestational age.
Main Methods:
- A population-based matched cohort study utilizing national Dutch registries.
- Inclusion of over 1.8 million singleton children born between 25 and 42 weeks gestation (1999-2009).
- Linking perinatal data with mandatory special education registry data.
Main Results:
- Overall special education prevalence was 6.6%, with rates as high as 34.7% for 25-week births versus 5.7% for 40-week births.
- All gestational age groups showed elevated adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for special education compared to 40-week controls.
- Risk factors like low maternal education, male sex, small for gestational age, and low Apgar scores further increased special education use.
Conclusions:
- A strong inverse relationship exists between gestational age and special education use.
- Increased risk for special education is evident even in late preterm and early-term/post-term births.
- Gestational age is a crucial factor influencing long-term educational support needs.
Objective:
To investigate the effect of gestational age on special education use at primary school age, and to examine specific groups with elevated risk.
Design, Setting And Patients:
Population-based matched cohort study linking data from the Dutch national perinatal registry (PERINED) of all singleton surviving children without major congenital abnormalities, born between 25+0 and 42+6 weeks of gestation between 1999 and 2009, with data of the mandatory special education registry of Statistics Netherlands.
Main Outcome Measures:
Use of special education at primary school age.
Results:
1 814 540 children were included. Overall prevalence of special education was 6.6%, with highest rates in children born at 25 weeks (34.7%) and lowest at 40 weeks (5.7%). Elevated adjusted ORs for special education compared with the reference of 40 weeks were found in all gestational age groups (25-29 weeks, 30-31 weeks, 32-36 weeks, 37-39 weeks and 41-42 weeks), with the highest adjusted OR (3.50 (95% CI, 3.26 to 3.77)) in children born at 25-29 weeks. Comparable ORs were obtained after 1 to 1 exact matching with controls born at 40 weeks. Low maternal education, male sex, small for gestational age and 5-min Apgar score<7 increased special education use at week 25 and above.
Conclusion:
There is a strong inverse effect of gestational age on special education use in this complete nationwide, decennium birth cohort. Increased risk of special education use is still present in late preterms and those born at early-term or post-term.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Oogenesis
Regression Toward the Mean
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Two-Way ANOVA
The two-way ANOVA analysis initially begins by stating the null hypothesis that there is an interaction effect between the two factors of a dataset. This effect can be visualized using line segments formed by joining the...

