Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Interfacial Electrochemical Methods: Overview01:06

Interfacial Electrochemical Methods: Overview

214
Interfacial electrochemical methods focus on the phenomena occurring at the boundary between an electrode and a solution, as opposed to bulk methods that concentrate on the solution's overall properties. These interfacial methods are classified as either static or dynamic based on the presence of a nonzero current in the electrochemical cell and the consistency of analyte concentrations. Static methods, such as potentiometry, measure the cell's potential without any significant current...
214
Overview of Microscopy Techniques01:22

Overview of Microscopy Techniques

9.6K
The early pioneers of microscopy opened a window into the invisible world of microorganisms. In 1830, Joseph Jackson Lister created an essentially modern light microscope. The 20th century saw the development of microscopes that leveraged nonvisible light, such as fluorescence microscopy that uses an ultraviolet light source and electron microscopy that uses short-wavelength electron beams. These advances significantly improved magnification, image resolution, and contrast. By comparison, the...
9.6K
Scanning Electron Microscopy01:07

Scanning Electron Microscopy

4.1K
A scanning electron microscope (SEM) is used to study the surface features of a sample by using an electron beam that scans the sample surface in a two-dimensional manner. Typically, areas between ~1 centimeter to 5 micrometers in width can be imaged. SEM can be used to image bacteria, viruses, tissues as well as larger samples like insects. Conventional SEM gives a magnification ranging from 20X to 30,000X and spatial resolution of 50 to 100 nanometers.
Fundamental Principles
Accelerated...
4.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

N-heterocyclic carbenes as clickable molecular anchors for electrochemical surface functionalization of metals and glassy carbon.

Chemical science·2025
Same author

Molecular Biomimicry and the Synthetic Synapse: Engineering a Stable Synaptogenic Extracellular Matrix.

ACS nano·2025
Same author

Good Readings Come in Threes: Understanding Electrodeposited Iridium Oxide for a Reproducible pH Microsensor Performance.

Analytical chemistry·2025
Same author

Impact of Droplet Wettability on Scanning Electrochemical Cell Microscopy Performance in Stainless Steels.

Chemical & biomedical imaging·2025
Same author

N-Heterocyclic Carbene Deposition on a Copper Powder Surface Using Mechanochemistry.

ACS applied materials & interfaces·2025
Same author

Quantifying surface tension of metastable aerosols via electrodeformation.

Nature communications·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 23, 2025

Probing Surface Electrochemical Activity of Nanomaterials using a Hybrid Atomic Force Microscope-Scanning Electrochemical Microscope AFM-SECM
08:31

Probing Surface Electrochemical Activity of Nanomaterials using a Hybrid Atomic Force Microscope-Scanning Electrochemical Microscope AFM-SECM

Published on: February 10, 2021

6.8K

Chronopotentiometric Approach in Scanning Electrochemical Cell Microscopy: Minimizing Surface Change Upon Landing.

Hu Zhou1, Yuanjiao Li1, Alban Morel2

  • 1Department of Chemistry, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 0B8, Canada.

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
|May 12, 2025
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a chronopotentiometric approach for scanning electrochemical cell microscopy, minimizing surface changes during sample analysis. This method preserves pristine surfaces for accurate electrochemical measurements, enhancing the technique's applications.

Keywords:
EISPDPSECCMaluminum alloychronopotentiometric approachcorrosion

More Related Videos

Scanning-probe Single-electron Capacitance Spectroscopy
10:53

Scanning-probe Single-electron Capacitance Spectroscopy

Published on: July 30, 2013

13.0K
Atomic Force Microscopy of Red-Light Photoreceptors Using PeakForce Quantitative Nanomechanical Property Mapping
14:13

Atomic Force Microscopy of Red-Light Photoreceptors Using PeakForce Quantitative Nanomechanical Property Mapping

Published on: October 24, 2014

11.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 23, 2025

Probing Surface Electrochemical Activity of Nanomaterials using a Hybrid Atomic Force Microscope-Scanning Electrochemical Microscope AFM-SECM
08:31

Probing Surface Electrochemical Activity of Nanomaterials using a Hybrid Atomic Force Microscope-Scanning Electrochemical Microscope AFM-SECM

Published on: February 10, 2021

6.8K
Scanning-probe Single-electron Capacitance Spectroscopy
10:53

Scanning-probe Single-electron Capacitance Spectroscopy

Published on: July 30, 2013

13.0K
Atomic Force Microscopy of Red-Light Photoreceptors Using PeakForce Quantitative Nanomechanical Property Mapping
14:13

Atomic Force Microscopy of Red-Light Photoreceptors Using PeakForce Quantitative Nanomechanical Property Mapping

Published on: October 24, 2014

11.7K

Area of Science:

  • Electrochemistry
  • Surface Science
  • Microscopy

Background:

  • Single-channel scanning electrochemical cell microscopy (SECCM) typically uses a chronoamperometric approach for pipette positioning.
  • Applying a potential during approach can cause transient currents that polarize the sample surface, affecting subsequent measurements.
  • This polarization is particularly problematic in corrosion studies and for analyzing pristine surfaces.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the conventional chronoamperometric approach with a novel chronopotentiometric approach for SECCM.
  • To evaluate the impact of each approach method on the sample surface.
  • To demonstrate the ability of SECCM to study pristine surfaces without alteration.

Main Methods:

  • Developed and implemented a chronopotentiometric approach method using zero applied current and monitoring potential.
  • Compared this method with the standard chronoamperometric approach (applying potential, monitoring current).
  • Utilized electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) to quantify surface changes by measuring charge transfer resistance.

Main Results:

  • The chronoamperometric approach resulted in significant surface changes, indicated by altered charge transfer resistance.
  • The chronopotentiometric approach with zero current minimized surface perturbation.
  • EIS measurements confirmed reduced surface modification when using the chronopotentiometric method.

Conclusions:

  • The chronopotentiometric approach is superior for SECCM when preserving the pristine state of the sample surface is critical.
  • This method mitigates the risk of surface alteration caused by electrochemical polarization during pipette approach.
  • The findings expand the utility of SECCM for investigating delicate or unaltered surfaces across various scientific disciplines.