Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 16, 2025
Home-Based Monitor for Gait and Activity Analysis
Published on: August 8, 2019
Hidden Markov model-based similarity measure (HMM-SM) for gait quality assessment of lower-limb prosthetic users
Gabriel Ng1,2, Jan Andrysek3,4
1Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A1, Canada.
Background:
Gait quality indices, such as the Gillette Gait Index or Gait Profile Score (GPS), can provide clinicians with objective, straightforward measures to quantify gait pathology and monitor changes over time. However, these methods often require motion capture or stationary gait analysis systems, limiting their accessibility. Inertial sensors offer a portable, cost-effective alternative for gait analysis. This study aimed to evaluate a novel hidden Markov model-based similarity measure (HMM-SM) for assessing gait quality directly from gyroscope and accelerometer data captured by inertial sensors.
Methods:
Walking trials were conducted with 26 lower-limb prosthetic users and 30 able-bodied individuals, using inertial sensors placed at various lower body locations. We computed the HMM-SM score along with other established inertial sensor-based methods, including the Movement Deviation Profile, Dynamic Time Warping, IMU-based Gait Normalcy Index, and Multifeature Gait Score. Spearman correlations with the GPS, a validated measure of gait quality, were assessed, as well as correlations among the inertial sensor methods. Welch's t-tests were used to evaluate the ability to distinguish between prosthetic subgroups.
Results:
The HMM-SM and other inertial sensor-based methods demonstrated moderate-to-strong correlations with the GPS (0.49 <|r|< 0.77 for significant correlations). Comparisons between different measures highlighted key similarities and differences, both in correlations and in their ability to differentiate between subgroups. Overall, the pelvis and lower leg sensors achieved significant correlations and outperformed the upper leg sensors, which did not achieve significant correlations with the GPS for any of the signal-based measures.
Conclusion:
Results suggest inertial sensors located at the pelvis and lower leg provide valid markers for monitoring overall gait quality, offering the potential to develop nonobtrusive, wearable systems to facilitate long-term monitoring. Such systems could enhance rehabilitation by enabling continuous gait assessment that can be easily integrated in clinical and everyday settings.
