Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 14, 2025

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
Published on: June 12, 2020
The Strengths and Weaknesses of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Symptoms and Normal Behaviors Scale (SWAN):
Ruqayah Alhajji1, Elaine Walsh2, Kenneth Charles Pike2
1College of Nursing, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Objective:
To examine the Strengths and Weaknesses of ADHD-Symptoms and Normal Behavior scale (SWAN) clinical utility as a diagnostic measure of ADHD in an ADHD clinic sample.
Method:
In a sample of 357 children (6-11 years old) referred for evaluation at an academic medical center, we explored the SWAN's diagnostic and convergent validity with the Hyperactivity-Inattention subscale of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ/HI) and concurrent validity with the Impairment Rating Scale (IRS).
Results:
The averaged (SWAN total) and the SWAN Hyperactivity/Impulsivity subscale (SWAN HI) showed significant and large correlations with the SDQ/HI (r = .69 and .65), respectively. The SWAN Attention Deficit subscale (SWAN AD) had a significant but smaller correlation (r = .49). The SWAN total had moderate correlation with the IRS average score ( = .33). In receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.71) for the SWAN total, the SWAN distinguished ADHD cases from non-ADHD cases with sensitivity of 83% but specificity of 47%.
Conclusion:
In a clinical sample, the SWAN total scores displayed a near-normal distribution. ADHD cases were distinguished from non-ADHD cases by the SWAN. The SWAN showed adequate convergent and concurrent validity with other symptoms and impairment measures.
Related Concept Videos
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Diagnostic Criteria and Symptoms
To diagnose ADHD, symptoms must manifest before age 12 and be evident across multiple settings....
Autism Spectrum Disorder
These core symptoms manifest differently among individuals, ranging from mild to severe. The disorder's complexity extends beyond its clinical presentation, encompassing a diverse range of biological, cognitive, and sociocultural influences.

