Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 14, 2025

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
Published on: January 19, 2019
Are humans still necessary? Expanding the discussion
Judi E See1, Julie Gilpin-McMinn2, Stephen L Dorton3
1Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
Abstract:
The rise of automation, artificial intelligence (AI), and autonomous systems raises important questions about the future role of humans and the field of human factors/ergonomics in workplaces. This paper builds on Dr. Peter Hancock's 2023 'Are Humans Still Necessary?' article published in the Ergonomics journal. Using a multi-method approach that included a debate, opinion polling, roundtable discussions, and AI queries, the current effort examined the necessity of human involvement in future work environments. Debate team members presented arguments for and against the need for human workers, considering human factors, technology, and socioeconomic factors. Observations indicate that while AI may handle routine tasks, humans will likely remain essential for complex decision making, creativity, and ethical considerations. The paper advocates for viewing workplace dynamics as collaborative human-AI partnerships rather than competition, highlighting the need for a transdisciplinary approach in which human factors/ergonomics professionals play a vital role in enhancing these relationships.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Biodiversity and Human Values
Requirements for Human Life
Oxygen
Atmospheric air is only about 20 percent oxygen, but that oxygen is a key component of the chemical reactions that keep the body alive, including the reactions that produce ATP. Brain cells are susceptible to a lack of oxygen because they require a...
Limits to Natural Selection
Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
Threats to Biodiversity
Evolutionary Psychology

