Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026
Cecal Ligation Puncture Procedure
Published on: May 7, 2011
The Effect of Early Warning Systems for Sepsis on Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Samer Ein Alshaeba1,2, Elizabeth A Marhoffer3,4, Jürgen L Holleck3,4
1Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. samer.einalshaeba@yale.edu.
Background:
The Surviving Sepsis Campaign strongly recommends that all hospitals screen for sepsis as part of performance improvement. The effect of screening for sepsis on mortality, time to antibiotics, and length of stay is uncertain.
Methods:
A systematic literature search was conducted using Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, Ovid Embase, Ovid Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection from earliest entry to June 1, 2024. We included all randomized controlled studies of any type of alert system to screen adult patients for sepsis. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Outcomes were pooled using random effects meta-analysis. Strength of evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system.
Results:
In total, we found 7 studies of 3409 patients with sepsis. The pooled odds ratio for mortality for patients randomized to early warning systems was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.60, 1.18). The average time to antibiotics was reported in 4 studies and found to be 0.08 h faster in the screening group (95% CI, - 0.44, 0.28). Length of stay was reported in 4 studies and found to be 0.27 days less in the screening group (95%, - 1.21, 0.66). All differences were non-significant. Overall strength of evidence was low due to risk of bias and imprecision.
Conclusions:
Based on the current body of randomized controlled studies, there is insufficient evidence to recommend screening for sepsis. Guidelines should reconsider current recommendations for screening for sepsis.
Prospero Registration:
CRD42024563222.
