Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 11, 2026

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education
Published on: June 21, 2010
Evaluating for learning and sustainability (ELS) framework: a realist synthesis
Marissa Bird1,2, Maura MacPhee3, James Shaw4
1Institute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, ON, Canada. marissa.bird@thp.ca.
Background:
Learning Health Systems (LHS), in which continuous and equitable improvements support optimization of healthcare practices, outcomes, experience, and costs, offer enormous potential for health system transformation. Within the LHS model, evaluation of health innovations assists in question identification, data collection, and targeted action, which facilitates continuous improvement. Evaluation that catalyzes learning may contribute to health innovation implementation, refinement, and sustainability, however, there is little consensus as to why certain evaluations support learning, while others impede it.
Methods:
Embedded in the implementation science literature, we conducted a realist synthesis to understand evaluative contextual factors and underlying mechanisms that best support health system learning and sustainable implementation of innovations. We sought to understand whether evaluations can 'work' to support learning and sustainability, in which contexts, for whom, and why. Working with an Expert Committee comprised of leaders in evaluation, innovation, sustainability, and realist methodology, we followed a five-stage process of: 1. Scoping the Review, 2. Building Theories, 3. Identifying the Evidence, 4. Evidence Selection and Appraisal, and 5.
Data Extraction And Synthesis:
Our Review Team and Expert Committee participated in iterative cycles of results interpretation and feedback.
Results:
Our synthesis includes 60 articles capturing the mechanisms and contextual factors driving learning and sustainability through evaluation. We found that evaluations that support learning and sustainability incorporate favourable organizational preconditions and focus on implementing rapid cyclical feedback loops that contribute to a culture of innovation and evaluation sustainability. Our findings have been organized into 6 Context-Mechanism-Outcome Configurations (CMOCs): 1. Embracing Risk & Failure; 2. Increasing Capacity for Evaluation; 3. Co-Producing Evaluation; 4. Implementing Learning Feedback Loops; 5. Creating Sustainability Culture; and 6. Becoming a Learning Organization. We have also translated findings into a series of Action Strategies for evaluation implementation to support health systems learning and sustainability.
Conclusions:
We identified key contextual factors and underlying mechanisms that make evaluations 'work' (or 'not work') to support learning and sustainability. Findings support the operationalization of LHS by translating CMOCs into Action Strategies for those tasked with completing evaluations with a view toward health system learning and innovation sustainability.
More Related Videos
12:55Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
Published on: September 27, 2020
13:44Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
Published on: December 9, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Sustainable Development
Naturalistic Observations
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Design Example: Sustainability in Concrete Building
There are multiple approaches to achieve sustainability in a commercial concrete building. For instance, construct a concrete parking area under the building, utilizing pervious concrete paver blocks in open areas to facilitate rainwater collection through an underground cistern.
Purposive Learning
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model